subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmerhumor | Suspicious-Engineer7 | idk4tv7 | <|sols|><|sot|>My man seriously fit advanced theme park physics on a 1990s game disc and it kind of freaks me out<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/s973BpL.jpg<|eol|><|soopr|>[Heres a video for those interested in learning about this Assembly demigod further. Forewarning: some of the later part is pretty remedial programming info.](https://youtu.be/expgMekxlvU)
and [here is Chris living his best life riding coasters these days.](https://youtu.be/UU73g72NTHc)<|eoopr|><|sor|>Dude is down bad for coasters<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 589 |
programmerhumor | ten_tons_of_light | idk8nsk | <|sols|><|sot|>My man seriously fit advanced theme park physics on a 1990s game disc and it kind of freaks me out<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/s973BpL.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Chris Sawyer is objectively one of the best programmers in the world just for this feat
Btw anyone know what he been up to? I know he made about ~40 mil from licensing+ atari lawsuit back in the day, I'm guessing he's enjoying retirement to this day. He basically disappeared since<|eor|><|soopr|>[He mostly uses the licensing money from Atari to travel the world visiting theme parks.](https://youtu.be/UU73g72NTHc) His count of ridden coasters is 700+. Someone in this thread may have ridden one with him and not even know.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 589 |
programmerhumor | Hidesuru | idkulps | <|sols|><|sot|>My man seriously fit advanced theme park physics on a 1990s game disc and it kind of freaks me out<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/s973BpL.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>multiplying numbers? that's easy.
try printing text to the console.<|eor|><|sor|>If you can print text to the console, you can do anything, since you could print text out telling the computer to run another program made using a less obtuse method of coding!<|eor|><|sor|>ALL code comes down to machine code in the end, and assembly is just that with mnemonics... So I don't know if I'd call it obtuse per se... But that being said I can not for the freaking life of me imagine why you'd code an entire game in it!
Edit: y'all can stop explaining the differences between assembly and a compiled language, or how slow CPUs were back then. Im old enough to have been gaming on an old 286 processor (no, that doesn't make me ancient, but I'm not 12 either).
My point was MERELY to express my understanding of the magnitude of the task with appreciation for his ability. I may have worded it badly but it's not like I'm saying "lol how dumb was that guy?" or something.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 542 |
programmerhumor | kinuipanui123 | idk3k29 | <|sols|><|sot|>My man seriously fit advanced theme park physics on a 1990s game disc and it kind of freaks me out<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/s973BpL.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Chris Sawyer is objectively one of the best programmers in the world just for this feat
Btw anyone know what he been up to? I know he made about ~40 mil from licensing+ atari lawsuit back in the day, I'm guessing he's enjoying retirement to this day. He basically disappeared since<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 499 |
programmerhumor | JetScootr | idk2ygu | <|sols|><|sot|>My man seriously fit advanced theme park physics on a 1990s game disc and it kind of freaks me out<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/s973BpL.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The big guy is Steve Wozniak, who coded an entire assembly language interpreter in one weekend. Without an editor. (ie, entering opcodes by hand via hex keypad) for the original Apple computer.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 478 |
programmerhumor | itsbett | idkcnmc | <|sols|><|sot|>My man seriously fit advanced theme park physics on a 1990s game disc and it kind of freaks me out<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/s973BpL.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I remember using assembly in my Computer Architecture class and after I was done with the semester project I was so relieved to never have to use it again.
I also remember our TA tried to have us build a binary search tree in assembly as our final project but all of us emailed him like Are you outside your damn mind<|eor|><|sor|>A part of me really enjoyed assembly. I enjoyed making dinky programs and how it helped me understand old computers and how old games worked.
But the biggest part of me is glad I never have to use it again.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 350 |
programmerhumor | Apart-Masterpiece-40 | idkw8k4 | <|sols|><|sot|>My man seriously fit advanced theme park physics on a 1990s game disc and it kind of freaks me out<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/s973BpL.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>multiplying numbers? that's easy.
try printing text to the console.<|eor|><|sor|>If you can print text to the console, you can do anything, since you could print text out telling the computer to run another program made using a less obtuse method of coding!<|eor|><|sor|>ALL code comes down to machine code in the end, and assembly is just that with mnemonics... So I don't know if I'd call it obtuse per se... But that being said I can not for the freaking life of me imagine why you'd code an entire game in it!
Edit: y'all can stop explaining the differences between assembly and a compiled language, or how slow CPUs were back then. Im old enough to have been gaming on an old 286 processor (no, that doesn't make me ancient, but I'm not 12 either).
My point was MERELY to express my understanding of the magnitude of the task with appreciation for his ability. I may have worded it badly but it's not like I'm saying "lol how dumb was that guy?" or something.<|eor|><|sor|>It was the 90s dude. Space and CPU limitations meant you couldnt code on top of 1,000 layers of abstraction like we can today.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 331 |
programmerhumor | ten_tons_of_light | idk7ml9 | <|sols|><|sot|>My man seriously fit advanced theme park physics on a 1990s game disc and it kind of freaks me out<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/s973BpL.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Started writing business applications in mainframe assembly in the early 80s. First project was writing a stock distribution system. Lots of numbers to multiply..<|eor|><|soopr|>Oof. Youre a trailblazer in your own right<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 316 |
programmerhumor | xibme | idkdwyo | <|sols|><|sot|>My man seriously fit advanced theme park physics on a 1990s game disc and it kind of freaks me out<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/s973BpL.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I remember using assembly in my Computer Architecture class and after I was done with the semester project I was so relieved to never have to use it again.
I also remember our TA tried to have us build a binary search tree in assembly as our final project but all of us emailed him like Are you outside your damn mind<|eor|><|soopr|>Same. Meanwhile Chris Sawyer was doing this at age 30. Madness<|eoopr|><|sor|>And for multiple games. I have a very fond memory of Transport Tycoon Deluxe in particular.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 316 |
programmerhumor | ten_tons_of_light | idk50rr | <|sols|><|sot|>My man seriously fit advanced theme park physics on a 1990s game disc and it kind of freaks me out<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/s973BpL.jpg<|eol|><|soopr|>[Heres a video for those interested in learning about this Assembly demigod further. Forewarning: some of the later part is pretty remedial programming info.](https://youtu.be/expgMekxlvU)
and [here is Chris living his best life riding coasters these days.](https://youtu.be/UU73g72NTHc)<|eoopr|><|sor|>Dude is down bad for coasters<|eor|><|soopr|>Yeah, his pure enthusiasm is infectious<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 306 |
programmerhumor | KitchenerLeslee | idkyall | <|sols|><|sot|>My man seriously fit advanced theme park physics on a 1990s game disc and it kind of freaks me out<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/s973BpL.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>multiplying numbers? that's easy.
try printing text to the console.<|eor|><|sor|>If you can print text to the console, you can do anything, since you could print text out telling the computer to run another program made using a less obtuse method of coding!<|eor|><|sor|>ALL code comes down to machine code in the end, and assembly is just that with mnemonics... So I don't know if I'd call it obtuse per se... But that being said I can not for the freaking life of me imagine why you'd code an entire game in it!
Edit: y'all can stop explaining the differences between assembly and a compiled language, or how slow CPUs were back then. Im old enough to have been gaming on an old 286 processor (no, that doesn't make me ancient, but I'm not 12 either).
My point was MERELY to express my understanding of the magnitude of the task with appreciation for his ability. I may have worded it badly but it's not like I'm saying "lol how dumb was that guy?" or something.<|eor|><|sor|>It was the 90s dude. Space and CPU limitations meant you couldnt code on top of 1,000 layers of abstraction like we can today.<|eor|><|sor|>We live in glass skyscrapers lol<|eor|><|sor|>Weinberg's Law: "If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization."<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 261 |
programmerhumor | ICanBeKinder | idkx552 | <|sols|><|sot|>My man seriously fit advanced theme park physics on a 1990s game disc and it kind of freaks me out<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/s973BpL.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>multiplying numbers? that's easy.
try printing text to the console.<|eor|><|sor|>If you can print text to the console, you can do anything, since you could print text out telling the computer to run another program made using a less obtuse method of coding!<|eor|><|sor|>ALL code comes down to machine code in the end, and assembly is just that with mnemonics... So I don't know if I'd call it obtuse per se... But that being said I can not for the freaking life of me imagine why you'd code an entire game in it!
Edit: y'all can stop explaining the differences between assembly and a compiled language, or how slow CPUs were back then. Im old enough to have been gaming on an old 286 processor (no, that doesn't make me ancient, but I'm not 12 either).
My point was MERELY to express my understanding of the magnitude of the task with appreciation for his ability. I may have worded it badly but it's not like I'm saying "lol how dumb was that guy?" or something.<|eor|><|sor|>It was the 90s dude. Space and CPU limitations meant you couldnt code on top of 1,000 layers of abstraction like we can today.<|eor|><|sor|>We live in glass skyscrapers lol<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 207 |
programmerhumor | okayestuser | idkc65l | <|sols|><|sot|>My man seriously fit advanced theme park physics on a 1990s game disc and it kind of freaks me out<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/s973BpL.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The big guy is Steve Wozniak, who coded an entire assembly language interpreter in one weekend. Without an editor. (ie, entering opcodes by hand via hex keypad) for the original Apple computer.<|eor|><|sor|>If Chris Sawyer is a demigod, then Steve Wozniak is an Elder God.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 196 |
programmerhumor | blkmmb | wy7uxi | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 44,053 |
programmerhumor | Normal_Knowledge966 | ilv26ca | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>What is the proper use of brainfuck?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,548 |
programmerhumor | DiamondIceNS | ilv3osm | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>What is the proper use of brainfuck?<|eor|><|sor|>If you stop to take a couple minutes to learn the syntax (there's only 8 symbols; 2 of them are for I/O and thus don't really matter) and go through a few code examples, it's actually a pretty enlightening implementation of a barebones Turing machine.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,071 |
programmerhumor | HolyDuckTurtle | ilv4rji | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>With this in mind, I'd love to hear about languages that *don't* fulfill their purpose well and / or are outclassed in their specialty by something else.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 988 |
programmerhumor | Nightshot666 | ilv423h | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>What about horrible languages created for fun like pythOwO<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 540 |
programmerhumor | blkmmb | ilv4yrr | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>What about horrible languages created for fun like pythOwO<|eor|><|soopr|>I am suwe thewe awe a wot of divewsified use case fow that wanguage.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 501 |
programmerhumor | MokausiLietuviu | ilvh79d | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>With this in mind, I'd love to hear about languages that *don't* fulfill their purpose well and / or are outclassed in their specialty by something else.<|eor|><|sor|>>and / or are outclassed in their specialty by something else
There are a whole load of languages rarely used simply because of this. I think a good example that's still going is Ada, but I specialise in old, rarely used ALGOL based languages. They were simply an iterative step onto better languages.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 443 |
programmerhumor | PM-Me-Your-TitsPlz | ilv6mdy | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>With this in mind, I'd love to hear about languages that *don't* fulfill their purpose well and / or are outclassed in their specialty by something else.<|eor|><|sor|>>languages that don't fulfill their purpose well
Javascript. It was never intended to be so widely used, yet here we are.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 427 |
programmerhumor | Mooshy_Swags | ilvcimy | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>All programming languages ~~are good~~ work when used properly.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 402 |
programmerhumor | dpash | ilvchqv | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>What is the proper use of brainfuck?<|eor|><|sor|>If you stop to take a couple minutes to learn the syntax (there's only 8 symbols; 2 of them are for I/O and thus don't really matter) and go through a few code examples, it's actually a pretty enlightening implementation of a barebones Turing machine.<|eor|><|sor|>What's fun is that whitespace is effectively just an encoded version of brainfuck.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 380 |
programmerhumor | athonis | ilvcvjx | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>What is the proper use of brainfuck?<|eor|><|sor|>If you stop to take a couple minutes to learn the syntax (there's only 8 symbols; 2 of them are for I/O and thus don't really matter) and go through a few code examples, it's actually a pretty enlightening implementation of a barebones Turing machine.<|eor|><|sor|>What's fun is that whitespace is effectively just an encoded version of brainfuck.<|eor|><|sor|>Ok, so I was like... ? And then it hit me that there is a programming language called Whitespace<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 356 |
programmerhumor | PoorCorrelation | ilvsvoc | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>With this in mind, I'd love to hear about languages that *don't* fulfill their purpose well and / or are outclassed in their specialty by something else.<|eor|><|sor|>>and / or are outclassed in their specialty by something else
There are a whole load of languages rarely used simply because of this. I think a good example that's still going is Ada, but I specialise in old, rarely used ALGOL based languages. They were simply an iterative step onto better languages.<|eor|><|sor|>Their purpose is if you end up time traveling back to the 80s and need a job<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 261 |
programmerhumor | blkmmb | ilv2mor | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>What is the proper use of brainfuck?<|eor|><|soopr|>It's in the name.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 242 |
programmerhumor | dckesler | ilvh0ab | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>With this in mind, I'd love to hear about languages that *don't* fulfill their purpose well and / or are outclassed in their specialty by something else.<|eor|><|sor|>>languages that don't fulfill their purpose well
Javascript. It was never intended to be so widely used, yet here we are.<|eor|><|sor|>You mean the giant legacy apis of the forever backwards compatible DOM might not be helpful to *checks GitHub* every imaginable environment ever?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 225 |
programmerhumor | MasterFubar | ilvlzy6 | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>What is the proper use of brainfuck?<|eor|><|sor|>If you stop to take a couple minutes to learn the syntax (there's only 8 symbols; 2 of them are for I/O and thus don't really matter) and go through a few code examples, it's actually a pretty enlightening implementation of a barebones Turing machine.<|eor|><|sor|>What's fun is that whitespace is effectively just an encoded version of brainfuck.<|eor|><|sor|>Ok, so I was like... ? And then it hit me that there is a programming language called Whitespace<|eor|><|sor|>> there is a programming language called Whitespace
All my Python programs are actually secret Whitespace code. The Python code is only camouflage to hide the real program.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 183 |
programmerhumor | aparanoidbw | ilv7bgm | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>What about horrible languages created for fun like pythOwO<|eor|><|soopr|>I am suwe thewe awe a wot of divewsified use case fow that wanguage.<|eoopr|><|sor|>Meme language are... _for the memes_
_Memes is life_
_give me memes or give me death!_ - Patrick Henry if memes were big in the 1700's
Like that person that did a C++ program and #define everything as a unicode emoji. Physically useless and literallly impossible to maintain but quite hilarious.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 166 |
programmerhumor | talaqen | ilv951c | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>If properly means in the right context too. Fuckers throwing blocking I/O languages at I/O wait problems. Or building NLP out of PHP.
Just because you can, doesnt mean you should. Every language has it place. I can open a window with a hammer, doesnt mean I should.
EDIT: I was the stupid ass who built an NLP engine in PHP. Dont be me.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 145 |
programmerhumor | Iggyhopper | ilvv6q3 | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>With this in mind, I'd love to hear about languages that *don't* fulfill their purpose well and / or are outclassed in their specialty by something else.<|eor|><|sor|>>languages that don't fulfill their purpose well
Javascript. It was never intended to be so widely used, yet here we are.<|eor|><|sor|>You mean the giant legacy apis of the forever backwards compatible DOM might not be helpful to *checks GitHub* every imaginable environment ever?<|eor|><|sor|>Lets support a language where some Apis exist in some browsers and some don't in others:
*ok that's like C on win32 vs linux.*
Ok how about 4 browsers with different Apis.
*That's... uh... alrighty then*
Ok what about the same Apis return different values:
*what the fuck are you smoking*
It seems like this language is becoming... more popular?
*Just kill me now.*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 131 |
programmerhumor | PooSham | ilv8f05 | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>HTML is a decent markup language for what it does. It's not a programming language though.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 125 |
programmerhumor | blkmmb | ilvcou7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Even HTML.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/9lixgcosw1k91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>All programming languages ~~are good~~ work when used properly.<|eor|><|soopr|>This comment ~~is good~~ works.
Also, I fail at formatting on mobile.
I am now good.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 120 |
programmerhumor | dickdemodickmarcinko | 6nyygc | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 44,007 |
programmerhumor | JuhaJGam3R | dkdcjqs | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>>What is your password?
Strongest security question ever<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8,310 |
programmerhumor | powerofm | dkdcyih | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,086 |
programmerhumor | gameboy17 | dkde8tj | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>Normally this would become the next trend, but I think you've already pretty much killed it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,941 |
programmerhumor | lets_move_to_voat | dkdf1cx | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>>What is your password?
Strongest security question ever<|eor|><|sor|>but...i was told to never give out my password<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,877 |
programmerhumor | DontBeSpooked-Frank | dkdfqb8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>>What is your password?
Strongest security question ever<|eor|><|sor|>but...i was told to never give out my password<|eor|><|sor|>Don't worry, I'm a Nigerian prince and need it to transfer all this money to your account.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,466 |
programmerhumor | pmmeyourpussyjuice | dkddqj3 | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.
<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,448 |
programmerhumor | sa87 | dkdegll | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>Normally this would become the next trend, but I think you've already pretty much killed it.<|eor|><|sor|>If the gif only used the first question then it's likely we have another 2 week volume control style run. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 872 |
programmerhumor | ntuttle11 | dkddrgs | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.
<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 802 |
programmerhumor | DCENTRLIZEintrnetPLZ | dkdef0l | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>Lol I love the colors one. My favorite is exactly #0CR522 not a shade off or I hate it. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 723 |
programmerhumor | KodaDude | dkdbuao | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>Is this OC? Either way, +1<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 651 |
programmerhumor | Arklur | dkddu35 | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.
<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.
<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 597 |
programmerhumor | twisted-teaspoon | dkde2hb | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.
<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.
<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.
<|eor|><|sor|>RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 573 |
programmerhumor | beck2424 | dkddwe1 | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.
<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.
<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 520 |
programmerhumor | htmlcoderexe | dkdep2w | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>Lol I love the colors one. My favorite is exactly #0CR522 not a shade off or I hate it. <|eor|><|sor|>>R<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 504 |
programmerhumor | natched | dkde79y | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.
<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.
<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.<|eor|><|sor|>I was expecting that last option to allow recursion.
<|eor|><|sor|>RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded<|eor|><|sor|>Error: Stack Overflow.
Please look up how to deal with this error on Stack Overflow<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 489 |
programmerhumor | Thingymadohicky | dkdefb4 | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>The breakfast option should ask for an image<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 439 |
programmerhumor | LondonNoodles | dkdfs9z | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>>What is your password?
Strongest security question ever<|eor|><|sor|>I once called Origin because they blocked my account after I had moved countries (and changed IP obviously), and they asked me the answer to my security question. I said I had no idea what the security question was, I had created the account years ago. The guy on the phone said "The question is : what's your credit card number?"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 435 |
programmerhumor | KappaccinoNation | dkdfes3 | <|sols|><|sot|>Who needs passwords when you have security questions?<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/NSmFQgg.gif<|eol|><|sor|>Normally this would become the next trend, but I think you've already pretty much killed it.<|eor|><|sor|>If the gif only used the first question then it's likely we have another 2 week volume control style run. <|eor|><|sor|>OP took our jobs! <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 410 |
programmerhumor | czp55 | 10uhk2o | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43,997 |
programmerhumor | datengeschichten | j7bvx4d | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>SQL: I care more about if it can be combined with other snacks<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,680 |
programmerhumor | KgxxEQy | j7c9fc9 | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>VBA: Its a peanut. Have fun figuring out how it works. Also, the moment it stops being one everything burns to the ground.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,329 |
programmerhumor | srone | j7bw59d | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Love the JS answer.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,225 |
programmerhumor | Cley_Faye | j7c1bhb | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I'm not used to funny posts in here. Nice work.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,202 |
programmerhumor | chisui | j7c8rim | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Haskell: Nuts can be generalized to a Monad.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,314 |
programmerhumor | Fireye04 | j7c56bs | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>WHAT JAVA SAID LMAO<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,122 |
programmerhumor | czp55 | j7cwgao | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I'm not used to funny posts in here. Nice work.<|eor|><|sor|>Same, it's good. Make OP do one everyday!<|eor|><|sor|>Maybe OP can save this sub<|eor|><|soopr|>This sounds suspiciously reminiscent of someone trying to hand me ownership of their legacy codebase because I happened to provide one decent PR.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,064 |
programmerhumor | Brian_E1971 | j7by42d | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Love the JS answer.<|eor|><|sor|>I can divide by potato and still get a result<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 968 |
programmerhumor | strixus | j7cfhqd | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>VBA: Its a peanut. Have fun figuring out how it works. Also, the moment it stops being one everything burns to the ground.<|eor|><|sor|>Also, all the documentation is about making peanut butter with Excel, with no indication of if this is a nut or not.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 739 |
programmerhumor | pingveno | j7c9d0n | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>SQL: I care more about if it can be combined with other snacks<|eor|><|sor|>MOAR `UPPER()`<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 681 |
programmerhumor | czp55 | j7cna99 | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>SQL: I care more about if it can be combined with other snacks<|eor|><|soopr|>I considered adding a SQL answer, but the transaction resulted in `207572 row(s) affected` so I rolled it back. Maybe it'll make it into v3.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 581 |
programmerhumor | MathsGuy1 | j7c86mn | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>WHAT JAVA SAID LMAO<|eor|><|sor|>C# is just microsoft Java (but also better).<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 533 |
programmerhumor | czp55 | j7btytc | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|soopr|>[v1 for reference](https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/z2r1c9/programming_legumes/)<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 480 |
programmerhumor | ZedTT | j7cyi0u | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I'm not used to funny posts in here. Nice work.<|eor|><|sor|>Same, it's good. Make OP do one everyday!<|eor|><|sor|>Maybe OP can save this sub<|eor|><|soopr|>This sounds suspiciously reminiscent of someone trying to hand me ownership of their legacy codebase because I happened to provide one decent PR.<|eoopr|><|sor|>See? Actual programmer humor ^
If I see another nonsensical backend/frontend meme I'm gonna die
This is your responsibility now<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 463 |
programmerhumor | ThisUserIsAFailure | j7c5e4t | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Love the JS answer.<|eor|><|sor|>I can divide by potato and still get a result<|eor|><|sor|>[object Object]<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 441 |
programmerhumor | need_ins_in_to | j7c71tg | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I'm not used to funny posts in here. Nice work.<|eor|><|sor|>Same, it's good. Make OP do one everyday!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 391 |
programmerhumor | AgentPaper0 | j7cvnuk | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>This is why I love C++<|eor|><|sor|>I swear half of programmers are afraid of C++ like it's some kind of black magic. The other half has never used it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 378 |
programmerhumor | STAR____STUFF | j7cegts | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Assembly Lang: Fundamentally, it looks like it is made up of the basic molecules which makes it a plants root.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 358 |
programmerhumor | EpicScizor | j7caivp | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>WHAT JAVA SAID LMAO<|eor|><|sor|>C# is just microsoft Java (but also better).<|eor|><|sor|>Not really.
It might have once been.
But linq, getters/setters, async, culture and asp.net are leagues ahead of java.
Java is all about creating extremely verbose business logic and maximizing useless name length. C# is also about business logic but much more efficient and nice code.<|eor|><|sor|>>But linq, getters/setters, async, culture and asp.net are leagues ahead of java.
He already said it was Java but better<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 343 |
programmerhumor | PityUpvote | j7cqf87 | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming Legumes v2.0<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/o9exmbw1kega1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Haskell: Nuts can be generalized to a Monad.<|eor|><|sor|>Monut<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 306 |
programmerhumor | furgfury | sevrh8 | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43,988 |
programmerhumor | karmastarved | hulwx4n | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Male or female?
Yes.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7,532 |
programmerhumor | segwhat | hulyutb | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I must know... WHAT IS THE ONE TRUE GENDER?!?!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 6,606 |
programmerhumor | AKernelPanic | hum3a04 | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I must know... WHAT IS THE ONE TRUE GENDER?!?!<|eor|><|sor|>`true`<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 4,688 |
programmerhumor | karmastarved | hulxdvf | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>tbh I was born true but nowdays identify myself as false.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,807 |
programmerhumor | JorganPubshire | hum57u5 | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Male or female?
Yes.<|eor|><|sor|>Once worked on a production system where the database had an attribute called isValidOrNot:boolean. That name always makes me chuckle because I think true is the only acceptable value<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,477 |
programmerhumor | Casper_Arg | humq4re | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I must know... WHAT IS THE ONE TRUE GENDER?!?!<|eor|><|sor|>`true`<|eor|><|sor|> !false<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,514 |
programmerhumor | TheGreatAnteo | hum2g4d | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Ah the two genders, true and false.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,450 |
programmerhumor | supercyberlurker | hum12mx | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I like how it's not even an enum.. but a boolean.
"Do you have gender? Yes or No?"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,318 |
programmerhumor | Eena-Rin | humlqt3 | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>No no, your professor is very woke. They don't ask what your gender is, they just ask if you have one. Gender? True/False<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 873 |
programmerhumor | Richard_Dick_Kickam | humcgyx | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I must know... WHAT IS THE ONE TRUE GENDER?!?!<|eor|><|sor|>[ object Object ]<|eor|><|sor|>No, thats female<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 872 |
programmerhumor | TheIrishBearcat | hum7t0z | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Everyone just ignoring `getSocialSecurityNumber` is too funny<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 815 |
programmerhumor | Mcwequiesk | humbpry | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I must know... WHAT IS THE ONE TRUE GENDER?!?!<|eor|><|sor|>[ object Object ]<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 616 |
programmerhumor | jllauser | hum1zyl | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Maybe they are being inclusive. They just want to know whether the person identifies with a gender or not.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 571 |
programmerhumor | dpahoe | hum2yk5 | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>tbh I was born true but nowdays identify myself as false.<|eor|><|sor|>Javascript doesnt mind if your true, 1, or j.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 547 |
programmerhumor | Apfelvater | humaau1 | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Male or female?
Yes.<|eor|><|sor|>Once worked on a production system where the database had an attribute called isValidOrNot:boolean. That name always makes me chuckle because I think true is the only acceptable value<|eor|><|sor|>Maybe it's a Schroedingers Boolean<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 537 |
programmerhumor | dhebevvtvt | hulykoc | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>tbh I was born true but nowdays identify myself as false.<|eor|><|sor|>I honestly think its all a spectrum. Depending on my mood Im truthy or falsy.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 507 |
programmerhumor | jeremyspuds | humfeyr | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I must know... WHAT IS THE ONE TRUE GENDER?!?!<|eor|><|sor|>argument out of bounds sound a lot more metal than non-binary<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 467 |
programmerhumor | joten70 | humkyhl | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I must know... WHAT IS THE ONE TRUE GENDER?!?!<|eor|><|sor|>You know how a bool is stored as zero or one? I'm thinking
0 = female
1 = male
Why do i think that? Because i'm childish<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 467 |
programmerhumor | ForsakenKoala6795 | hulz2i0 | <|sols|><|sot|>damn my professor isn't very gender inclusive<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/4tfvkds3qge81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Male or female?
Yes.<|eor|><|sor|>Field should be
hasDick: boolean<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 438 |
programmerhumor | ndxinroy7 | 11htxbu | <|sols|><|sot|>Doom runs everywhere<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/09hto6yl3qla1.png<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43,968 |
programmerhumor | Sea_Cup_5561 | jav99yo | <|sols|><|sot|>Doom runs everywhere<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/09hto6yl3qla1.png<|eol|><|sor|>I pretty sure whatever civilisation we will encounter, they will have the exact same, perfectly compatible version of doom<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,106 |
programmerhumor | DmMacniel | javps2l | <|sols|><|sot|>Doom runs everywhere<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/09hto6yl3qla1.png<|eol|><|sor|>I pretty sure whatever civilisation we will encounter, they will have the exact same, perfectly compatible version of doom<|eor|><|sor|>of course, because omega brain John Carmack is the creator of the singularity and also the big bang.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,160 |
programmerhumor | starlulz | javghz8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Doom runs everywhere<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/09hto6yl3qla1.png<|eol|><|sor|>Computer Engineer: *I've connected my 1990s Macbook to it and given it a computer virus*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,003 |
programmerhumor | caskey | jav6d8t | <|sols|><|sot|>Doom runs everywhere<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/09hto6yl3qla1.png<|eol|><|sor|>Everything runs doom. Even digital cameras.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 924 |
programmerhumor | butchkid1 | javk4y2 | <|sols|><|sot|>Doom runs everywhere<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/09hto6yl3qla1.png<|eol|><|sor|>If it can play audio, you play never gonna give you up.
If it has a display, you play bad apple.
And if it can execute code, YOU RUN DOOM<|eor|><|sor|>But if it plays audio and video together, then you gotta play the [Gandalf Jam](https://youtu.be/G1IbRujko-A), multiple screens if possible.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 654 |
programmerhumor | EDEADLINK | jav6fwf | <|sols|><|sot|>Doom runs everywhere<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/09hto6yl3qla1.png<|eol|><|sor|>Quite an achievement if you think about it.
Because there is no way they use IEEE 754 floats.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 474 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.