subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmerhumor | Conscious_Scar_9293 | iamrzgf | <|sols|><|sot|>When 'Googling' is becoming popular skill for CVs<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/c3plsn5v4q291.gif<|eol|><|sor|>fuck you for making this a gif. I thought I was dying for a second<|eor|><|sor|>Fucking same. I legit thought I was hallucinating.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 57 |
programmerhumor | hennell | ian1su1 | <|sols|><|sot|>When 'Googling' is becoming popular skill for CVs<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/c3plsn5v4q291.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I really wish i could put googling as a skill on my resume because it honestly is one of my skills<|eor|><|sor|>I've said it before, and I'll say it again.
Advanced Googling and dorking are legitimate skills.
How legitimate you ask?
EC-Council tests advanced Googling as a means Open Source Intel Gathering (OSINT) for their Certified Ethical Hacker cert. Google dorking has its own section within the Exploit DB and it has been abused to find password files, sensitive info, and PII to name a few.
With just a few advanced search features, you enhance your ability to find information ten fold.
Don't let anyone tell you that's not a skill. Anyone can Google. Few do it well.<|eor|><|sor|>How do i google well?<|eor|><|sor|>There's basic techniques like structuring your search term to something more likely to get results. Bad Googlers are more likely to ask questions, good Googlers look for key words likely to be in the page that answers their question.
Then you have the more advanced techniques like using + or - modifiers to indicate inclusion or exclusion of certain terms, or grouping a phrase together with " symbols. You can also limit your search to a specific site, or to only find files like pdfs or .docs
Google has an advanced search page where you can fill in the options you want, then see how they define that in the search box. Use it a bit and you'll start to use the most frequent options for you just naturally!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 52 |
programmerhumor | raltoid | iamvpy8 | <|sols|><|sot|>When 'Googling' is becoming popular skill for CVs<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/c3plsn5v4q291.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I really wish i could put googling as a skill on my resume because it honestly is one of my skills<|eor|><|sor|>I've said it before, and I'll say it again.
Advanced Googling and dorking are legitimate skills.
How legitimate you ask?
EC-Council tests advanced Googling as a means Open Source Intel Gathering (OSINT) for their Certified Ethical Hacker cert. Google dorking has its own section within the Exploit DB and it has been abused to find password files, sensitive info, and PII to name a few.
With just a few advanced search features, you enhance your ability to find information ten fold.
Don't let anyone tell you that's not a skill. Anyone can Google. Few do it well.<|eor|><|sor|>>and it has been abused to find password files, sensitive info, and PII to name a few
The amount of internet facing cameras you can find from just a simple search is insane.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 51 |
programmerhumor | LeftIsBest-Tsuga | iamg0w9 | <|sols|><|sot|>When 'Googling' is becoming popular skill for CVs<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/c3plsn5v4q291.gif<|eol|><|sor|>this reminds me of the original Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedias that came out after CD-ROM was first released for consumers. absolute garbage, looked like a giant pixelated travel brochure, and the UI was something between old Carmen Sandiego games and Myst.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 50 |
programmerhumor | Appoxo | iamx32y | <|sols|><|sot|>When 'Googling' is becoming popular skill for CVs<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/c3plsn5v4q291.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I really wish i could put googling as a skill on my resume because it honestly is one of my skills<|eor|><|sor|>I've said it before, and I'll say it again.
Advanced Googling and dorking are legitimate skills.
How legitimate you ask?
EC-Council tests advanced Googling as a means Open Source Intel Gathering (OSINT) for their Certified Ethical Hacker cert. Google dorking has its own section within the Exploit DB and it has been abused to find password files, sensitive info, and PII to name a few.
With just a few advanced search features, you enhance your ability to find information ten fold.
Don't let anyone tell you that's not a skill. Anyone can Google. Few do it well.<|eor|><|sor|>>and it has been abused to find password files, sensitive info, and PII to name a few
The amount of internet facing cameras you can find from just a simple search is insane.<|eor|><|sor|>*clears throat*
#Shodan.io<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 50 |
programmerhumor | BDMayhem | ian2l7v | <|sols|><|sot|>When 'Googling' is becoming popular skill for CVs<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/c3plsn5v4q291.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I really wish i could put googling as a skill on my resume because it honestly is one of my skills<|eor|><|sor|>I've said it before, and I'll say it again.
Advanced Googling and dorking are legitimate skills.
How legitimate you ask?
EC-Council tests advanced Googling as a means Open Source Intel Gathering (OSINT) for their Certified Ethical Hacker cert. Google dorking has its own section within the Exploit DB and it has been abused to find password files, sensitive info, and PII to name a few.
With just a few advanced search features, you enhance your ability to find information ten fold.
Don't let anyone tell you that's not a skill. Anyone can Google. Few do it well.<|eor|><|sor|>How do i google well?<|eor|><|sor|>There's basic techniques like structuring your search term to something more likely to get results. Bad Googlers are more likely to ask questions, good Googlers look for key words likely to be in the page that answers their question.
Then you have the more advanced techniques like using + or - modifiers to indicate inclusion or exclusion of certain terms, or grouping a phrase together with " symbols. You can also limit your search to a specific site, or to only find files like pdfs or .docs
Google has an advanced search page where you can fill in the options you want, then see how they define that in the search box. Use it a bit and you'll start to use the most frequent options for you just naturally!<|eor|><|sor|>> Bad Googlers are more likely to ask questions, good Googlers look for key words likely to be in the page that answers their question.
I think that used to be true, but Google has put so much effort into catering to bad Googlers that natural language can produce better results than just using keywords. Google results these days are more about what they think you want than what you actually search for, and when you ask questions, it's easier for Google to ascertain your intentions.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 48 |
programmerhumor | Gradash | znh11c | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43,790 |
programmerhumor | Tamsta-273C | j0h552q | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>To the hell AI creating code, give me AI creating documentation!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8,082 |
programmerhumor | _jbd_ | j0h776c | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>To the hell AI creating code, give me AI creating documentation!<|eor|><|sor|>I have an AI that writes documentation! I call him InternAI.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,919 |
programmerhumor | Unupgradable | j0hceii | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Bruh?
We're actively cheering for AI stealing our jobs.
*We're the ones building it!*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,749 |
programmerhumor | altmoonjunkie | j0ho8yx | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I DARE chatgpt to even try and understand what our source code is doing. Lord knows no one here does.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,882 |
programmerhumor | VariousComment6946 | j0h0372 | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Incorrect meme. Programmers never gives a f.
Mostly accurate is:
I stole your code
its not my code<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,175 |
programmerhumor | De_Wouter | j0hi1xw | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>If business could actually define requirements, I would be worried.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,322 |
programmerhumor | Th3Uknovvn | j0h4vmu | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Except we are not lol, we programmers have lived through this whole low code bullshit since the beginning of dawn now.
Everyone in the field should already know that we are saying "AI are going to take our jobs" is a joke and should not be understood unironically for 5-10 years from now at least.
We don't encourage them to use the code the AI gives you because if some junior is confidently enough and decided to put that in production, the shit it could bring is beyond imagination for everyone who fix it. The code could look nice with clear comments for each step they make but sometimes hidden behind it is just some random stuff that the AI just throws in to look legit but will break the whole thing when you run it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,305 |
programmerhumor | bighunter1313 | j0hkb8l | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Bruh?
We're actively cheering for AI stealing our jobs.
*We're the ones building it!*<|eor|><|sor|>Until AI can make AI, well have a job.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,295 |
programmerhumor | masterchief0587 | j0i5xtl | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I DARE chatgpt to even try and understand what our source code is doing. Lord knows no one here does.<|eor|><|sor|>I dare chatgpt to figure out what the hell our PMs are trying to ask for<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,065 |
programmerhumor | Canonip | j0hco83 | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>To the hell AI creating code, give me AI creating documentation!<|eor|><|sor|>I have an AI that writes documentation! I call him InternAI.<|eor|><|sor|>Does this AI come in robot form, so it can also make coffee?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 857 |
programmerhumor | _raydeStar | j0hh51d | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Incorrect meme. Programmers never gives a f.
Mostly accurate is:
I stole your code
its not my code<|eor|><|sor|>Stack overflow has created in me a sensibility that all code belongs to the void, and we just reach in and borrow from it.
AI will be my new stack overflow, with much more refined questions. All hail.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 690 |
programmerhumor | sammy-taylor | j0hez77 | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>To the hell AI creating code, give me AI creating documentation!<|eor|><|sor|>ChatGPT is much better at writing documentation than it is at writing code.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 581 |
programmerhumor | ben_g0 | j0hs872 | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Bruh?
We're actively cheering for AI stealing our jobs.
*We're the ones building it!*<|eor|><|sor|>Until AI can make AI, well have a job.<|eor|><|sor|>Well now I know what I'm trying in ChatGPT next<|eor|><|sor|>I just asked it to write a new version of ChatGPT, but it just generated a program that forwards any requests to the OpenAI API and returns the response it received. It already knows how to cheat.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 526 |
programmerhumor | Unupgradable | j0hkodf | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Bruh?
We're actively cheering for AI stealing our jobs.
*We're the ones building it!*<|eor|><|sor|>Until AI can make AI, well have a job.<|eor|><|sor|>Well now I know what I'm trying in ChatGPT next<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 519 |
programmerhumor | NullVoidPointer | j0hkke4 | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>To the hell AI creating code, give me AI creating documentation!<|eor|><|sor|>I have an AI that writes documentation! I call him InternAI.<|eor|><|sor|>Does this AI come in robot form, so it can also make coffee?<|eor|><|sor|>You can get the InternProAI for 18$/hr, it can write code + documentation, debug, and most importantly make 2* more coffee!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 445 |
programmerhumor | LetUsSpeakFreely | j0hb09i | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>AI can "create" art, but it doesn't mean it's good art or have the desired outcome.
AI can "create" code, but it didn't mean it's good code or achieving the desired result.
AI can only replicate what it's been trained to see. It can't make judgement calls or create something totally new.
AI music has existed for awhile. But if all you did was have an AI generate music that was trained in 50s style music, we'd never have had the 60s era rock, 70s funk and disco, 80s rap, hair bands, and synthesizer pop, 90s grunge and gangsta rap, etc.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 361 |
programmerhumor | brianl047 | j0hguug | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Except we are not lol, we programmers have lived through this whole low code bullshit since the beginning of dawn now.
Everyone in the field should already know that we are saying "AI are going to take our jobs" is a joke and should not be understood unironically for 5-10 years from now at least.
We don't encourage them to use the code the AI gives you because if some junior is confidently enough and decided to put that in production, the shit it could bring is beyond imagination for everyone who fix it. The code could look nice with clear comments for each step they make but sometimes hidden behind it is just some random stuff that the AI just throws in to look legit but will break the whole thing when you run it.<|eor|><|sor|>Not even just about breaking; it's giving code snippets
So the entire thing is architecturally unsound and probably doesn't meet the needs of the business. Code reuse, code style and technology choice goodbye
I would probably trust AI code with FaaS only and even then only if I wrote five paragraphs specifying exactly what I wanted<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 334 |
programmerhumor | kdavis37 | j0hd9qs | <|sols|><|sot|>After months of suffering bullying, it feels a bit like vengeance.<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bhygiq0k1a6a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Are there even programmers on this sub? Who the hell is mad about AI development?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 328 |
programmerhumor | L4993Rz | 11cekei | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43,722 |
programmerhumor | Elegant-Variety-7482 | ja2orlt | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's like you can't candidate for waiter if you don't have in your instagram pictures of you serving plates to your friends.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9,294 |
programmerhumor | Affectionate_Tax3468 | ja2rmgz | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The same people:
Oh, no no no, your own repositories or off-work contributions to other projects dont matter in terms of experience with language X/framework Y.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 5,174 |
programmerhumor | BeardedGinge | ja2ya8q | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I have told interviewers I don't code for fun outside of work. I code for 8 hours at work, my free time is spent doing things I really enjoy<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 4,333 |
programmerhumor | kiralala7956 | ja2zr2y | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The same people:
Oh, no no no, your own repositories or off-work contributions to other projects dont matter in terms of experience with language X/framework Y.<|eor|><|sor|>Yup, they want you to have all of these "proofs" you're programming literally every minute you're awake, but when it comes to adjusting salary based on experience, all of a sudden only working hours matter.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,603 |
programmerhumor | fanta_bhelpuri | ja2sok5 | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's like you can't candidate for waiter if you don't have in your instagram pictures of you serving plates to your friends.<|eor|><|sor|>Or you can't be a firefighter if you don't set your neighbors' houses on fire to practice<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,892 |
programmerhumor | Tinkerballsack | ja32mhj | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's like you can't candidate for waiter if you don't have in your instagram pictures of you serving plates to your friends.<|eor|><|sor|>I can't be a sysadmin because I don't let people take pictures of me staring at the wall hoping the ceiling caves in after reading the ticket I just got.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,875 |
programmerhumor | SnooOranges7287 | ja2zj8r | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I have told interviewers I don't code for fun outside of work. I code for 8 hours at work, my free time is spent doing things I really enjoy<|eor|><|sor|>True af, they think we are Bots coding for 24/7 without rest or hobbies to enjoy the life and whenever i tell them this they are like : hmm u know u might not be good enough we are looking for real programmers :|<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,483 |
programmerhumor | thomash01 | ja34c5c | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Git accepts commits in the past. There are tools to make it look however you like -> https://github.com/gelstudios/gitfiti<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,217 |
programmerhumor | Evazzion | ja2re94 | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I doubt people who are hiring care about green squares over what you can actually do with code<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,008 |
programmerhumor | dregan | ja2z5p2 | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Just got a senior dev position. My only github commit was for the interview coding challenge.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 972 |
programmerhumor | Leeroy_c | ja31a89 | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The same people:
Oh, no no no, your own repositories or off-work contributions to other projects dont matter in terms of experience with language X/framework Y.<|eor|><|sor|>Yup, they want you to have all of these "proofs" you're programming literally every minute you're awake, but when it comes to adjusting salary based on experience, all of a sudden only working hours matter.<|eor|><|sor|>they expect you to build an entire and fully functional cms in your free time but then they say that they don't value your experience with that language because "it's was not a real working scenario" -.-<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 957 |
programmerhumor | EDEADLINK | ja2vq5u | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Looks like lots of work on private repos.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 703 |
programmerhumor | noob-nine | ja2w750 | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's like you can't candidate for waiter if you don't have in your instagram pictures of you serving plates to your friends.<|eor|><|sor|>Or you can't be a firefighter if you don't set your neighbors' houses on fire to practice<|eor|><|sor|>Or you can't be a funeral director because you are not a serial killer<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 674 |
programmerhumor | ricco19 | ja2zbq4 | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I doubt people who are hiring care about green squares over what you can actually do with code<|eor|><|sor|>I get your point but lots of people hiring are terrible at it.... like the guy in the OP.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 560 |
programmerhumor | Vaguely_accurate | ja2wni2 | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Looks like lots of work on private repos.<|eor|><|sor|>The twitter poster backed down somewhat when he discovered private activity doesn't show up.
Seems he is recruiting for a senior dev role and claims someone sent this in to show they were a good fit. I assume someone who doesn't use github (or at least hasn't worked on public repos) who uploaded some sample code for job applications, and this guy thought publicly dunking on job applicants by creatively misunderstanding their profile would attract more attention and get more applications.
Sadly, probably will work.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 546 |
programmerhumor | Protuhj | ja3dtll | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The same people:
Oh, no no no, your own repositories or off-work contributions to other projects dont matter in terms of experience with language X/framework Y.<|eor|><|sor|>Yup, they want you to have all of these "proofs" you're programming literally every minute you're awake, but when it comes to adjusting salary based on experience, all of a sudden only working hours matter.<|eor|><|sor|>they expect you to build an entire and fully functional cms in your free time but then they say that they don't value your experience with that language because "it's was not a real working scenario" -.-<|eor|><|sor|>*Motherfuckers, I see your devs in the background using the shit I built!*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 527 |
programmerhumor | BeardedGinge | ja31d79 | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I have told interviewers I don't code for fun outside of work. I code for 8 hours at work, my free time is spent doing things I really enjoy<|eor|><|sor|>True af, they think we are Bots coding for 24/7 without rest or hobbies to enjoy the life and whenever i tell them this they are like : hmm u know u might not be good enough we are looking for real programmers :|<|eor|><|sor|>I think that's why I got my current job, straight up told them the above. Y'all are about work /life balance, this is how I achieve that<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 504 |
programmerhumor | ccelik97 | ja357vj | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The same people:
Oh, no no no, your own repositories or off-work contributions to other projects dont matter in terms of experience with language X/framework Y.<|eor|><|sor|>There are scripts that manually populate a git history for git repos to make it seem like your GitHub profile belongs to a one man army of a corporate.
^(You can even make your GitHub history to display a pixelized dick & balls if you want to.) ~~^(\\s)~~<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 420 |
programmerhumor | ILikeLenexa | ja32teg | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I have told interviewers I don't code for fun outside of work. I code for 8 hours at work, my free time is spent doing things I really enjoy<|eor|><|sor|>Even though I enjoy coding, 50 hours of it in a week is a good amount.
I don't think there's anything I'd like to spend more time doing than that, frankly.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 365 |
programmerhumor | frenetix | ja3tb8c | <|sols|><|sot|>Sit down<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/cv8rnyls9kka1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The same people:
Oh, no no no, your own repositories or off-work contributions to other projects dont matter in terms of experience with language X/framework Y.<|eor|><|sor|>Yup, they want you to have all of these "proofs" you're programming literally every minute you're awake, but when it comes to adjusting salary based on experience, all of a sudden only working hours matter.<|eor|><|sor|>they expect you to build an entire and fully functional cms in your free time but then they say that they don't value your experience with that language because "it's was not a real working scenario" -.-<|eor|><|sor|>*Motherfuckers, I see your devs in the background using the shit I built!*<|eor|><|sor|>Like the primary developer of Homebrew, used by hundreds if not thousands of Google engineers, was rejected when applying for a job at Google.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 363 |
programmerhumor | ARAXON-KUN | g942eh | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43,702 |
programmerhumor | someuser_2 | for3x3p | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Why is there a trend of mocking java? Genuinely asking.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,722 |
programmerhumor | eXecute_bit | forjj8b | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Why is there a trend of mocking java? Genuinely asking.<|eor|><|sor|>A lot of the hate comes from Java's client-side features.
Applets running in a browser sandbox was a killer feature in the 90s at the infancy of the public jumping on the Web. It just turns out that the sandbox wasn't as tightly secured as originally thought, requiring a never ending stream of user-visible security updates.
Java aimed to run the same app on multiple platforms, so it had its own graphics system rather than using native widgets. This was probably a good design decision at the time as the software was easier to test, write documentation for, etc., without worrying about the nuances of this windowing system or that. Back then, even apps on the same platform could look vastly different other than the basic window chrome, so honestly this wasn't only a Java thing... but Java stuck around longer, so it stood out more over time. Java improved it's native look-and-feel, but the _defaults_ we're still pretty bad for backwards compatibility.
Java as a platform was also introduced back in the dialup modem days, so the idea of shipping and updating the platform separate from the application runtimes sounded like a good idea. In the end, it did cause problems when different apps needed different runtime versions -- though a lot of this is on the lack of maintenance and support of those applications themselves. .NET has a similar design and issue, except that it has the OS vendor to help distribute patches natively, and it also benefited from Java's hindsight when making sure that applications ran with the appropriate runtime version.
Bootstrapping the runtime was also perceived as slow. It has gotten progressively better over the years, and for long-running server-side stuff hardly matters. With the move to "serverless" it's still important and improvements have been coming steadily since Java 8.
On the server side, and as a _language_, Java is still doing quite well. It will be the next COBOL, though I expect that time is still far off. I joked with coworkers, when the NJ plea for COBOL devs came out, that "I'll learn COBOL as soon as Java is dead -- which other languages tell me will be _any day now_."
Edit: Obligatory "thanks!" for my first gold and doubling my karma. Lots of good discussion below, both for and against, even if Java isn't everyone's cup of [(Iced)Tea](https://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/Main_Page).<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,257 |
programmerhumor | orokro | forr5b9 | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Why is there a trend of mocking java? Genuinely asking.<|eor|><|sor|>A lot of the hate comes from Java's client-side features.
Applets running in a browser sandbox was a killer feature in the 90s at the infancy of the public jumping on the Web. It just turns out that the sandbox wasn't as tightly secured as originally thought, requiring a never ending stream of user-visible security updates.
Java aimed to run the same app on multiple platforms, so it had its own graphics system rather than using native widgets. This was probably a good design decision at the time as the software was easier to test, write documentation for, etc., without worrying about the nuances of this windowing system or that. Back then, even apps on the same platform could look vastly different other than the basic window chrome, so honestly this wasn't only a Java thing... but Java stuck around longer, so it stood out more over time. Java improved it's native look-and-feel, but the _defaults_ we're still pretty bad for backwards compatibility.
Java as a platform was also introduced back in the dialup modem days, so the idea of shipping and updating the platform separate from the application runtimes sounded like a good idea. In the end, it did cause problems when different apps needed different runtime versions -- though a lot of this is on the lack of maintenance and support of those applications themselves. .NET has a similar design and issue, except that it has the OS vendor to help distribute patches natively, and it also benefited from Java's hindsight when making sure that applications ran with the appropriate runtime version.
Bootstrapping the runtime was also perceived as slow. It has gotten progressively better over the years, and for long-running server-side stuff hardly matters. With the move to "serverless" it's still important and improvements have been coming steadily since Java 8.
On the server side, and as a _language_, Java is still doing quite well. It will be the next COBOL, though I expect that time is still far off. I joked with coworkers, when the NJ plea for COBOL devs came out, that "I'll learn COBOL as soon as Java is dead -- which other languages tell me will be _any day now_."
Edit: Obligatory "thanks!" for my first gold and doubling my karma. Lots of good discussion below, both for and against, even if Java isn't everyone's cup of [(Iced)Tea](https://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/Main_Page).<|eor|><|sor|>Actually Java STARTED with using native controls for their windowed apps. This was called AWT.
Because it was cumbersome to get good results using AWT, THEN Java made their own windowing toolkit, which was more stable.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 748 |
programmerhumor | SnowFox1414 | fos13nv | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>There are only two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about and the ones nobody uses.
Bjarne Stroustrup<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 666 |
programmerhumor | givemeadrink | fos0x1w | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>But.. but.. I like java. Maybe thats an unpopular opinion but if it works it works<|eor|><|sor|>You know what they say. There are 2 types of languages: languages people bitch about and languages no one use.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 584 |
programmerhumor | maxhaton | forqbjg | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Somehow on this subredit most seem to think that Java is the worst language ever but if you hate JS you just don't know it enough/are bad at it...<|eor|><|sor|>\*whispers\*
half the people on this subreddit have never worked on/in a real codebase or used enough languages to be able to compare.
Java is good enough for government work. Javascript at its core is an insult to half a century of programming language design but it's good enough (and lots of developers know no better, e.g. Ask a web programmer why static types are helpful in big codebases) so that's what you have to know in today's market.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 508 |
programmerhumor | BroDonttryit | forpr27 | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>But.. but.. I like java. Maybe thats an unpopular opinion but if it works it works<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 499 |
programmerhumor | daniu | ford2dv | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>More like "If your boss tells you you're fired, I hope you know Java".<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 421 |
programmerhumor | hunter_mark | for43a3 | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Catch exception and return to caller. Or in other words, fire your boss.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 368 |
programmerhumor | eXecute_bit | forvb7q | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Why is there a trend of mocking java? Genuinely asking.<|eor|><|sor|>A lot of the hate comes from Java's client-side features.
Applets running in a browser sandbox was a killer feature in the 90s at the infancy of the public jumping on the Web. It just turns out that the sandbox wasn't as tightly secured as originally thought, requiring a never ending stream of user-visible security updates.
Java aimed to run the same app on multiple platforms, so it had its own graphics system rather than using native widgets. This was probably a good design decision at the time as the software was easier to test, write documentation for, etc., without worrying about the nuances of this windowing system or that. Back then, even apps on the same platform could look vastly different other than the basic window chrome, so honestly this wasn't only a Java thing... but Java stuck around longer, so it stood out more over time. Java improved it's native look-and-feel, but the _defaults_ we're still pretty bad for backwards compatibility.
Java as a platform was also introduced back in the dialup modem days, so the idea of shipping and updating the platform separate from the application runtimes sounded like a good idea. In the end, it did cause problems when different apps needed different runtime versions -- though a lot of this is on the lack of maintenance and support of those applications themselves. .NET has a similar design and issue, except that it has the OS vendor to help distribute patches natively, and it also benefited from Java's hindsight when making sure that applications ran with the appropriate runtime version.
Bootstrapping the runtime was also perceived as slow. It has gotten progressively better over the years, and for long-running server-side stuff hardly matters. With the move to "serverless" it's still important and improvements have been coming steadily since Java 8.
On the server side, and as a _language_, Java is still doing quite well. It will be the next COBOL, though I expect that time is still far off. I joked with coworkers, when the NJ plea for COBOL devs came out, that "I'll learn COBOL as soon as Java is dead -- which other languages tell me will be _any day now_."
Edit: Obligatory "thanks!" for my first gold and doubling my karma. Lots of good discussion below, both for and against, even if Java isn't everyone's cup of [(Iced)Tea](https://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/Main_Page).<|eor|><|sor|>I've got a very different experience. I came from ops before I switched over to programming full time; Java applications on the server side are a nightmare. Java can be fast, but frequently the written software is not. Regardless of speed Java is a nightmare memory wise and is usually what constrains server resources.
Most applications I've seen in the real world developed with the spring framework (as a specific example) leave ports open that give you direct memory access to the internal Java runtime. I don't know if that's a default, but it is very common and a huge risk. Poorly designed "enterprise" libraries that are tightly coupled to the applications code seem common, and frequently are massively out of date or not updated since the late 90s also seem incredibly common.
You can write good software in Java, but there is something about the language and the people that actually write it that do so very poorly in practice. Bad logging, unstable software, massive bloat, poor maintenance. They're almost always fragile bags of fireworks waiting to blow up.
The languages built on top of the JVM seems to have improved the quality of software a little bit, but the services are still just as unreasonably memory hungry, and they're usually still built with the same old enterprise libraries that are constantly a source of pain.
None of that has to do with client-side features or an ugly UI, though I've experienced those as well. IMHO the only good thing that Java had going for it was the ability to run the apps equally well on different OS's. That's really not design requirement for most software anymore and when it is making a native app cross platform isn't that difficult even in straight C.
Every time I've seen a piece of Java software, there seems to be a better tool for the job operationally. The languages built on top of the JVM are interesting but are still crippled by the JVM itself.<|eor|><|sor|>It sounds like your complaints are about
- Spring, a bloated framework
- tight coupling and application design
- applications using outdated libraries
- open and insecure ports in the above
- resource usage and general stability
With the exception of perhaps memory usage, which was a conscious design decision and acknowledged trade-off to a degree, none of those are problems with the language or the JVM as a platform. They're symptoms of bad software development, which can occur in any language with any program of sufficient complexity.
Is the bad design the product of the language; or is it the result of a language so popular and accessible that, over the years, this is the result of decades of developers at varying levels of talent? To some degree, that old, unmaintained "enterprise" library is still used because -- despite being compiled for Java 1.4 in 2003 -- it _still works_. That's quite an accomplishment, even if it's not perfect software. How much .NET 1.0 code is still out there? It's probably far less, but the same level of accomplishment if it works and runs.
There's terrible Java code out there. Personally, I hate the bloat of Spring so I don't use it. Developers come in a wide range of skill levels, and they can crap over any language. Visual Basic developers got the same kind of shit; that was also a very accessible language, so a higher variation in quality.
Respectfully, I think you have confused correlation with causation.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 340 |
programmerhumor | mark0016 | for9un7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Why is there a trend of mocking java? Genuinely asking.<|eor|><|sor|>Most java applications (that I encounter on a daily basis) suffer from terrible design on the functionality side of things. Based on the experience of my friends and colleagues I would say I'm not the only one. That's probably not a fault of the language itself and more the mindset of a typical java dev team.
From my personal experience with (mostly internally developed) java software they all somehow end up really bloated with features nobody would ever want to use instead of focusing on what the application was originally intended for. Also they somehow never use standard OS integration for stuff like notifications or popups and have a built in auto-update systems so if you don't store the application executables in a place you don't have write permission to as a normal user (the standard way on Linux for example) the whole thing breaks and decides tho just not launch at all because you must have your updates.
It's not that I don't encounter software written in different languages that have the same or similar problems it's just that 75% of the time the bloody thing is written in java.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 339 |
programmerhumor | NotATroll71106 | forjzk9 | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>That explanation for Java is essentially what I told the interns when they asked why I made a webpage with JSP.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 290 |
programmerhumor | zChewbacca | forqwpa | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Most of the people who hate on Java don't even know why they don't like it, they just see other people saying it and parrot that opinion. If you asked them to give reasons, most of them wouldn't know what to say other than "I saw it on Reddit".<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 280 |
programmerhumor | lVlulcan | fos0t6k | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Why is there a trend of mocking java? Genuinely asking.<|eor|><|sor|>A lot of the hate comes from Java's client-side features.
Applets running in a browser sandbox was a killer feature in the 90s at the infancy of the public jumping on the Web. It just turns out that the sandbox wasn't as tightly secured as originally thought, requiring a never ending stream of user-visible security updates.
Java aimed to run the same app on multiple platforms, so it had its own graphics system rather than using native widgets. This was probably a good design decision at the time as the software was easier to test, write documentation for, etc., without worrying about the nuances of this windowing system or that. Back then, even apps on the same platform could look vastly different other than the basic window chrome, so honestly this wasn't only a Java thing... but Java stuck around longer, so it stood out more over time. Java improved it's native look-and-feel, but the _defaults_ we're still pretty bad for backwards compatibility.
Java as a platform was also introduced back in the dialup modem days, so the idea of shipping and updating the platform separate from the application runtimes sounded like a good idea. In the end, it did cause problems when different apps needed different runtime versions -- though a lot of this is on the lack of maintenance and support of those applications themselves. .NET has a similar design and issue, except that it has the OS vendor to help distribute patches natively, and it also benefited from Java's hindsight when making sure that applications ran with the appropriate runtime version.
Bootstrapping the runtime was also perceived as slow. It has gotten progressively better over the years, and for long-running server-side stuff hardly matters. With the move to "serverless" it's still important and improvements have been coming steadily since Java 8.
On the server side, and as a _language_, Java is still doing quite well. It will be the next COBOL, though I expect that time is still far off. I joked with coworkers, when the NJ plea for COBOL devs came out, that "I'll learn COBOL as soon as Java is dead -- which other languages tell me will be _any day now_."
Edit: Obligatory "thanks!" for my first gold and doubling my karma. Lots of good discussion below, both for and against, even if Java isn't everyone's cup of [(Iced)Tea](https://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/Main_Page).<|eor|><|sor|>Actually Java STARTED with using native controls for their windowed apps. This was called AWT.
Because it was cumbersome to get good results using AWT, THEN Java made their own windowing toolkit, which was more stable.<|eor|><|sor|>I was wondering why so many of the components I had seen had AWT as a part of the import path<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 216 |
programmerhumor | Kirogo | fos0xk5 | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Why is there a trend of mocking java? Genuinely asking.<|eor|><|sor|>A lot of the hate comes from Java's client-side features.
Applets running in a browser sandbox was a killer feature in the 90s at the infancy of the public jumping on the Web. It just turns out that the sandbox wasn't as tightly secured as originally thought, requiring a never ending stream of user-visible security updates.
Java aimed to run the same app on multiple platforms, so it had its own graphics system rather than using native widgets. This was probably a good design decision at the time as the software was easier to test, write documentation for, etc., without worrying about the nuances of this windowing system or that. Back then, even apps on the same platform could look vastly different other than the basic window chrome, so honestly this wasn't only a Java thing... but Java stuck around longer, so it stood out more over time. Java improved it's native look-and-feel, but the _defaults_ we're still pretty bad for backwards compatibility.
Java as a platform was also introduced back in the dialup modem days, so the idea of shipping and updating the platform separate from the application runtimes sounded like a good idea. In the end, it did cause problems when different apps needed different runtime versions -- though a lot of this is on the lack of maintenance and support of those applications themselves. .NET has a similar design and issue, except that it has the OS vendor to help distribute patches natively, and it also benefited from Java's hindsight when making sure that applications ran with the appropriate runtime version.
Bootstrapping the runtime was also perceived as slow. It has gotten progressively better over the years, and for long-running server-side stuff hardly matters. With the move to "serverless" it's still important and improvements have been coming steadily since Java 8.
On the server side, and as a _language_, Java is still doing quite well. It will be the next COBOL, though I expect that time is still far off. I joked with coworkers, when the NJ plea for COBOL devs came out, that "I'll learn COBOL as soon as Java is dead -- which other languages tell me will be _any day now_."
Edit: Obligatory "thanks!" for my first gold and doubling my karma. Lots of good discussion below, both for and against, even if Java isn't everyone's cup of [(Iced)Tea](https://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/Main_Page).<|eor|><|sor|>Java is still prevalent in the high school classroom.<|eor|><|sor|>Java is still used in a lot of entreprises, the Java ecosystem as a whole (Java and all jvm-based languages) has no alternative in some fields (looking at you, Hadoop). Teaching Java at any level still makes complete sense, whatever you might think<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 216 |
programmerhumor | Piwakkio | forljf3 | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Why is there a trend of mocking java? Genuinely asking.<|eor|><|sor|>Most java applications (that I encounter on a daily basis) suffer from terrible design on the functionality side of things. Based on the experience of my friends and colleagues I would say I'm not the only one. That's probably not a fault of the language itself and more the mindset of a typical java dev team.
From my personal experience with (mostly internally developed) java software they all somehow end up really bloated with features nobody would ever want to use instead of focusing on what the application was originally intended for. Also they somehow never use standard OS integration for stuff like notifications or popups and have a built in auto-update systems so if you don't store the application executables in a place you don't have write permission to as a normal user (the standard way on Linux for example) the whole thing breaks and decides tho just not launch at all because you must have your updates.
It's not that I don't encounter software written in different languages that have the same or similar problems it's just that 75% of the time the bloody thing is written in java.<|eor|><|sor|>Java developer here.
First thing first, I'm not, by all means, an UI expert. But if you are using Java for a standalone application...I feel like you are doing something wrong. I mean, not like you can't do it...but feels like using the wrong tool for the job.
I have always worked as a backend developer for web application, and in my opinion, in this context, Java does it's job. It's the best language on the market? Well the "absolute best" doesn't really exist, depends on your requirements. You need a strongly OPP language with a consistent community and rich framework ecosystem? Java it's a good choice.
Anyway, it probably start to feel it's age. Newest programming language, like Kotlin, offer out of the box, functionality that Java have with the implementation of several third parts libraries. So if you are starting from scratch, maybe there is something even more efficient than that.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 201 |
programmerhumor | TrueDuality | forsvy1 | <|sols|><|sot|>Java is the best<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uxs5wnj01ev41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Why is there a trend of mocking java? Genuinely asking.<|eor|><|sor|>A lot of the hate comes from Java's client-side features.
Applets running in a browser sandbox was a killer feature in the 90s at the infancy of the public jumping on the Web. It just turns out that the sandbox wasn't as tightly secured as originally thought, requiring a never ending stream of user-visible security updates.
Java aimed to run the same app on multiple platforms, so it had its own graphics system rather than using native widgets. This was probably a good design decision at the time as the software was easier to test, write documentation for, etc., without worrying about the nuances of this windowing system or that. Back then, even apps on the same platform could look vastly different other than the basic window chrome, so honestly this wasn't only a Java thing... but Java stuck around longer, so it stood out more over time. Java improved it's native look-and-feel, but the _defaults_ we're still pretty bad for backwards compatibility.
Java as a platform was also introduced back in the dialup modem days, so the idea of shipping and updating the platform separate from the application runtimes sounded like a good idea. In the end, it did cause problems when different apps needed different runtime versions -- though a lot of this is on the lack of maintenance and support of those applications themselves. .NET has a similar design and issue, except that it has the OS vendor to help distribute patches natively, and it also benefited from Java's hindsight when making sure that applications ran with the appropriate runtime version.
Bootstrapping the runtime was also perceived as slow. It has gotten progressively better over the years, and for long-running server-side stuff hardly matters. With the move to "serverless" it's still important and improvements have been coming steadily since Java 8.
On the server side, and as a _language_, Java is still doing quite well. It will be the next COBOL, though I expect that time is still far off. I joked with coworkers, when the NJ plea for COBOL devs came out, that "I'll learn COBOL as soon as Java is dead -- which other languages tell me will be _any day now_."
Edit: Obligatory "thanks!" for my first gold and doubling my karma. Lots of good discussion below, both for and against, even if Java isn't everyone's cup of [(Iced)Tea](https://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/Main_Page).<|eor|><|sor|>I've got a very different experience. I came from ops before I switched over to programming full time; Java applications on the server side are a nightmare. Java can be fast, but frequently the written software is not. Regardless of speed Java is a nightmare memory wise and is usually what constrains server resources.
Most applications I've seen in the real world developed with the spring framework (as a specific example) leave ports open that give you direct memory access to the internal Java runtime. I don't know if that's a default, but it is very common and a huge risk. Poorly designed "enterprise" libraries that are tightly coupled to the applications code seem common, and frequently are massively out of date or not updated since the late 90s also seem incredibly common.
You can write good software in Java, but there is something about the language and the people that actually write it that do so very poorly in practice. Bad logging, unstable software, massive bloat, poor maintenance. They're almost always fragile bags of fireworks waiting to blow up.
The languages built on top of the JVM seems to have improved the quality of software a little bit, but the services are still just as unreasonably memory hungry, and they're usually still built with the same old enterprise libraries that are constantly a source of pain.
None of that has to do with client-side features or an ugly UI, though I've experienced those as well. IMHO the only good thing that Java had going for it was the ability to run the apps equally well on different OS's. That's really not design requirement for most software anymore and when it is making a native app cross platform isn't that difficult even in straight C.
Every time I've seen a piece of Java software, there seems to be a better tool for the job operationally. The languages built on top of the JVM are interesting but are still crippled by the JVM itself.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 193 |
programmerhumor | hetfield37 | oevl73 | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43,651 |
programmerhumor | Faeton73 | h48lsf8 | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>Usually you provoked the issue too...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,570 |
programmerhumor | hetfield37 | h48mi7h | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>Usually you provoked the issue too...<|eor|><|soopr|>Since you're usually the one working on the project - makes sense indeed.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 705 |
programmerhumor | DerKnerd | h48zcan | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>This is honestly the way I handle all my side projects. It is actually quite useful, because you can easily keep track on what needs to be done. And when you have more than 10 side projects you actively develop it is really helpful.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 611 |
programmerhumor | Mistifyed | h49fz8a | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>Usually you provoked the issue too...<|eor|><|soopr|>Since you're usually the one working on the project - makes sense indeed.<|eoopr|><|sor|>Schedule a meeting with yourself to talk about how this issue can be prevented in the future.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 416 |
programmerhumor | SharksPreedateTrees | h48vd4f | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>Just Jira things<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 361 |
programmerhumor | thexar | h48x28u | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>If you don't track your work, you didn't work.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 304 |
programmerhumor | Plastivore | h490r2q | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>And then wait for that feedback email, and confirm that you are happy with the way you dealt with your own incident.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 235 |
programmerhumor | regorsec | h49h3nl | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>Usually you provoked the issue too...<|eor|><|soopr|>Since you're usually the one working on the project - makes sense indeed.<|eoopr|><|sor|>Schedule a meeting with yourself to talk about how this issue can be prevented in the future.<|eor|><|sor|>Id open a ticket to schedule that meeting. I hear im pretty busy lately.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 191 |
programmerhumor | SnooSnooper | h49dmoy | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>This is honestly the way I handle all my side projects. It is actually quite useful, because you can easily keep track on what needs to be done. And when you have more than 10 side projects you actively develop it is really helpful.<|eor|><|sor|>I would even use ticketing software as a personal management tool... if I could be trusted to actually execute any of those tickets <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 183 |
programmerhumor | SushiThief | h49b5xt | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>Just Jira things<|eor|><|sor|>Jira needs a dark mode.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 163 |
programmerhumor | poor_boy_ | h48wbur | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>I used to manage my manager using this exact method. He only looked at the raw numbers of JIRAs everyone had and assumed we had a fair distribution if I had the same number as everyone else. Mind you, the real reason I did that was so I could track outstanding work items I still needed to work on; it was the best way of ensuring I didnt overlook anything.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 119 |
programmerhumor | NailiME84 | h499417 | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>Your order is wrong,
Fix the issue.
Open ticket
assign to self
close ticket.
Ticketing system at my last company had a Status field when opening. I would often change to to closed so it automatically closed it as it created it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 115 |
programmerhumor | MaroonBookPro | h49hl9k | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>I used to manage my manager using this exact method. He only looked at the raw numbers of JIRAs everyone had and assumed we had a fair distribution if I had the same number as everyone else. Mind you, the real reason I did that was so I could track outstanding work items I still needed to work on; it was the best way of ensuring I didnt overlook anything.<|eor|><|sor|>Isn't all of that exactly what jira is for?
* project/tasks overview for managers
* workload balancing amongst the team
* personal task tracking / todo list<|eor|><|sor|>*How I gamed the system by using the task management system to manage my tasks.*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 100 |
programmerhumor | StarkillerX42 | h49dpxs | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>Just Jira things<|eor|><|sor|>Jira needs a dark mode.<|eor|><|sor|>Everything has dark mode when you have the Dark Reader extension<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 97 |
programmerhumor | gingimli | h49ab2k | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>Usually you provoked the issue too...<|eor|><|sor|>Its always fun to receive praise on resolving an issue so fast when youre the one that provoked the issue to being with.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 93 |
programmerhumor | CoffeePieAndHobbits | h49im2y | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>Just Jira things<|eor|><|sor|>Jira needs a dark mode.<|eor|><|sor|>Everything has dark mode when you have the Dark Reader extension<|eor|><|sor|>Everything has dark mode if you turn the monitor off.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 93 |
programmerhumor | LowB0b | h4a3s8h | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>This is honestly the way I handle all my side projects. It is actually quite useful, because you can easily keep track on what needs to be done. And when you have more than 10 side projects you actively develop it is really helpful.<|eor|><|sor|>Even in a corporate/company setting it is pretty much obligatory. Can't push anything to production without a ticket.
Can't even justify your time spent working on something without a ticket.
Ticket is needed, management demands it<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 91 |
programmerhumor | AcidCyborg | h49ahhn | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>Usually you provoked the issue too...<|eor|><|sor|>Its always fun to receive praise on resolving an issue so fast when youre the one that provoked the issue to being with.<|eor|><|sor|>*job security intensifies*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 80 |
programmerhumor | __batterylow__ | h49fb05 | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>If you don't track your work, you didn't work.<|eor|><|sor|>Guilty of this in this year but still somehow managed to get promoted lmfao<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 78 |
programmerhumor | CoffeePieAndHobbits | h49jjmx | <|sols|><|sot|>*Sad freelance noises*<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/3qzjx2s1nl971.png<|eol|><|sor|>And then wait for that feedback email, and confirm that you are happy with the way you dealt with your own incident.<|eor|><|sor|>*If you were satisified with this resolution, please consider taking a moment to fill out a brief survey...*<|eor|><|sor|>'Technician was rude, unshaven, and kinda smells.'<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 76 |
programmerhumor | ChillboBeutlin | tm1ol6 | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43,647 |
programmerhumor | w1n5t0nM1k3y | i1wtjrw | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>This video could have been a comic strip.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 4,289 |
programmerhumor | deepuw | i1x4cys | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>Step 1: find low wage remote job
Step 2: automate *but don't say anything*
Repeat 10 times.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,455 |
programmerhumor | J1mj0hns0n | i1xa1nt | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>Step 1: find low wage remote job
Step 2: automate *but don't say anything*
Repeat 10 times.<|eor|><|sor|>Didn't somebody do something like this already? Also I remember a story of a man who took a coding job in the USA and outsourced his workload to someone in China for 75% less and he just took the spare money lol<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,760 |
programmerhumor | kanduvisla | i1wt7so | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>I usually joke with my co-worker that a lot of people we work with can easily be replaced with a batch script.
The funny thing is, it's not even a joke!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,630 |
programmerhumor | alexander_the_dead | i1wtso0 | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>This video could have been a comic strip.<|eor|><|sor|>The comic strip could've been a plain text.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,434 |
programmerhumor | apex_flux_34 | i1wxvx4 | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>Im a mechanical engineer, one of my college buddies is a savant level software engineer. He was hired into a black program at Lockheed and ended up parting ways with them a few years later because they wouldnt implement the automation hed come up with. They ended up buying it from him a few years later after hed gone out on his own and fully developed a sellable package. Hes stupidly wealthy now and retired at 28 years old.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,143 |
programmerhumor | Sceptz | i1ww4m2 | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>This video could have been a comic strip.<|eor|><|sor|>The comic strip could've been a plain text.<|eor|><|sor|>The plain text could have been an npm package with 742 dependencies.
Wait, hold on, going the wrong way...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,119 |
programmerhumor | deepuw | i1xa6aw | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>Step 1: find low wage remote job
Step 2: automate *but don't say anything*
Repeat 10 times.<|eor|><|sor|>Didn't somebody do something like this already? Also I remember a story of a man who took a coding job in the USA and outsourced his workload to someone in China for 75% less and he just took the spare money lol<|eor|><|sor|>The outsourcing story it's said to be quite common<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 837 |
programmerhumor | deepuw | i1xfc6v | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>Step 1: find low wage remote job
Step 2: automate *but don't say anything*
Repeat 10 times.<|eor|><|sor|>Didn't somebody do something like this already? Also I remember a story of a man who took a coding job in the USA and outsourced his workload to someone in China for 75% less and he just took the spare money lol<|eor|><|sor|>The outsourcing story it's said to be quite common<|eor|><|sor|>Depends on how confidential your work is.<|eor|><|sor|>Hold on a sec, I'm asking my dev team abroad to write a script to answer your comment.
*Proceeds to adjust his monocle*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 640 |
programmerhumor | Pitboyx | i1wx4em | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>I usually joke with my co-worker that a lot of people we work with can easily be replaced with a batch script.
The funny thing is, it's not even a joke!<|eor|><|sor|>How many people do you think are a batch script with a human facade to collect the paycheck<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 637 |
programmerhumor | camelCaseRedditUser | i1wz3lj | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>Im a mechanical engineer, one of my college buddies is a savant level software engineer. He was hired into a black program at Lockheed and ended up parting ways with them a few years later because they wouldnt implement the automation hed come up with. They ended up buying it from him a few years later after hed gone out on his own and fully developed a sellable package. Hes stupidly wealthy now and retired at 28 years old.<|eor|><|sor|>>retired at 28 years old.
Me who started learning programming at age 28 ;(<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 540 |
programmerhumor | rndmcmder | i1wzv1e | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>Sometimes I daydream about applying for a lot of fulltime bs jobs, automate them and receive multiple salaries.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 513 |
programmerhumor | new_pribor | i1x1nvm | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>This video could have been a comic strip.<|eor|><|sor|>The comic strip could've been a plain text.<|eor|><|sor|>The plain text could have been an npm package with 742 dependencies.
Wait, hold on, going the wrong way...<|eor|><|sor|>The npm package with 742 dependencies could have been a 69.99$ AAA game by EA with ads and micro transactions<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 443 |
programmerhumor | aryan2304 | i1xibkh | <|sols|><|sot|>Typical thoughts of software engineers<|eot|><|sol|>https://v.redd.it/fjt4uaiyrap81<|eol|><|sor|>I actually used Python to do something like this. Basically, I was volunteering for a startup and they gave me a webpage that had a list of websites, and my job was to click on every link and check if the website throws errors or not. The webpage was divided into 35 tabs, and each tab had around 20 links that I had to check. Of course, I never did all of them, but around 2 tabs every day.
But then, I realized I can use python to scrape the website and get the whole list of websites and also make requests to them and check if they throw 404 error. It took me around an hour to check 2 tabs, but Python checked 35 tabs within 10 minutes! The script was really simple too and the company was happy as well.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 408 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.