subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmerhumor | T-J_H | hegqm9k | <|sols|><|sot|>My CS professor<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/zodqvtcmm0q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Real programmers just call `random()` until you get the right order<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,797 |
programmerhumor | riseagainstTO09 | hegg9t5 | <|sols|><|sot|>My CS professor<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/zodqvtcmm0q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Computer scientists write a sorting algorithm once, then call mySort()<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,459 |
programmerhumor | DingusMcButtFace | hegn5e4 | <|sols|><|sot|>My CS professor<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/zodqvtcmm0q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The whole point of learning how to write sorting algorithms in a CS curriculum is to introduce students to algorithms and how to analyze them, not to tell them to reinvent the wheel.
In my systems programming class I had to write my own version of `malloc`. Did my professor tell us to do that because he expected us to create a more effecient version than the standard C `malloc`? Was he just lazy and needed to keep us busy? No, of course not. There's a lot to be gained by doing things like that. CS isn't just writing code.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,013 |
programmerhumor | CDno_Mlqko | heglqvp | <|sols|><|sot|>My CS professor<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/zodqvtcmm0q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Computer Scientists write sorting algorithms*
*At University.<|eor|><|soopr|>Facts, true Chads just call .sort() without looking back<|eoopr|><|sor|>std::sort : am I a joke to you<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 975 |
programmerhumor | enano_aoc | hegc7q4 | <|sols|><|sot|>My CS professor<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/zodqvtcmm0q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Not only programmers, software developers do also call \`sort\` unless they have a *very* good reason to write the algorithm themselves.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 936 |
programmerhumor | TehGM | heghv7s | <|sols|><|sot|>My CS professor<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/zodqvtcmm0q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>And smart people don't reinvent the wheel unless that's needed.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 871 |
programmerhumor | majora11f | heh5nxt | <|sols|><|sot|>My CS professor<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/zodqvtcmm0q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Starting my CS course was a real shock as someone who had just self taught myself python before and never thought once to do things myself.<|eor|><|sor|>I firmly believe a CS degree is much more useful in teaching you how to think through problems thoroughly than it is for teaching you how to write code<|eor|><|sor|>Ive always thought CS (and college in general) was less about the languages you learn, but more about HOW to learn them. I can't remember how to add 2 matrices in C++, C#, or Java, but I know how to look them up!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 832 |
programmerhumor | DutchLeopardNL | heghvh7 | <|sols|><|sot|>My CS professor<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/zodqvtcmm0q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Starting my CS course was a real shock as someone who had just self taught myself python before and never thought once to do things myself.<|eor|><|soopr|>I am experiencing the same thing; my professor has us learning C++ and I am really starting to appreciate Python and its syntax a lot more.<|eoopr|><|sor|>Wait.... You appreciate Python syntax over C++'s syntax..... Disgustin<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 661 |
programmerhumor | ItsAMeTribial | hegchjc | <|sols|><|sot|>My CS professor<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/zodqvtcmm0q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Not only programmers, software developers do also call \`sort\` unless they have a *very* good reason to write the algorithm themselves.<|eor|><|sor|>Everyone will write their own specific sort function if it's needed. But in 99% of problems the default one are enough, and probably better than most developers could write themselves. If someone writes sorting functions each time their have to sort something just because they are "computer scientists", then they are shitty programmers. Most modern frameworks give awesome tools which we should use and not critique those who use them<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 655 |
programmerhumor | Dumbledore18 | hegeewj | <|sols|><|sot|>My CS professor<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/zodqvtcmm0q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Starting my CS course was a real shock as someone who had just self taught myself python before and never thought once to do things myself.<|eor|><|soopr|>I am experiencing the same thing; my professor has us learning C++ and I am really starting to appreciate Python and its syntax a lot more.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 631 |
programmerhumor | jjdmol | heggi6y | <|sols|><|sot|>My CS professor<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/zodqvtcmm0q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Computer Scientists write sorting algorithms*
*At University.<|eor|><|sor|>It's nevertheless good to have a grasp at how sorting is done though. It allows you to know which inputs lead to bad performance, that partial-ordering sorting keys (that cannot compare each pair of elements, f.e. ordering the nodes of a graph) won't work as expected, etc. And why.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 491 |
programmerhumor | PrecisePigeon | hegofrc | <|sols|><|sot|>My CS professor<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/zodqvtcmm0q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Computer Scientists write sorting algorithms*
*At University.<|eor|><|soopr|>Facts, true Chads just call .sort() without looking back<|eoopr|><|sor|>std::sort : am I a joke to you<|eor|><|sor|>I dont use C++. Its rife with STDs<|eor|><|sor|>Just use protection, you'll be fine.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 475 |
programmerhumor | erebuxy | heggef8 | <|sols|><|sot|>My CS professor<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/zodqvtcmm0q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I mean if you are using something like Python, it is unlikely that your own algorithm is nearly as fast as the native one.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 463 |
programmerhumor | invisible_admin | s4pzne | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37,349 |
programmerhumor | decayedamp1337 | hst3j8n | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>"How has the pandemic changed your life"
Me: it hasn't really, I just sit around typing on a computer all day, same as its always been.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,646 |
programmerhumor | ASpaceOstrich | hst4des | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The pandemic taught me one thing. People being forced to live even a fraction of my normal life started having massive mental health issues. Therefore my lifestyle is likely the reason my depression won't go away.
Now if only I could do anything about it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,486 |
programmerhumor | bodhipooh | hstegmc | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>"How has the pandemic changed your life"
Me: it hasn't really, I just sit around typing on a computer all day, same as its always been.<|eor|><|sor|>Ain't that the truth!? I say this ALL THE TIME, and people think I am joking. If it wasn't because I have to step out to walk the dog, I could spend days on end holed up at home.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 581 |
programmerhumor | LostTeleporter | hst5wdg | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The pandemic taught me one thing. People being forced to live even a fraction of my normal life started having massive mental health issues. Therefore my lifestyle is likely the reason my depression won't go away.
Now if only I could do anything about it.<|eor|><|sor|>It truly was a *lightbulb* moment for me as well. As the days progressed, I saw more and more people starting to complain about how they can barely leave their homes. They are unable to meet their friends. They cannot go out on dates. No more eating out, or late night parties. And the realization was not even instantaneous. It took some time of seeing all those posts and videos and blogs, before I went - oh, it's *not* supposed to be like that? Maybe as much as an year.
TLDR: I now have Tinder+, and a *lifetime* subscription of Bumble.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 572 |
programmerhumor | igrowcabbage | hst3lm0 | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Glad I quit smoking years ago, so that your meme isn't 100% correct.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 311 |
programmerhumor | TeddyPerkins95 | hsskmvt | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Can relate<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 267 |
programmerhumor | ydna_eissua | hst875f | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The pandemic taught me one thing. People being forced to live even a fraction of my normal life started having massive mental health issues. Therefore my lifestyle is likely the reason my depression won't go away.
Now if only I could do anything about it.<|eor|><|sor|>It truly was a *lightbulb* moment for me as well. As the days progressed, I saw more and more people starting to complain about how they can barely leave their homes. They are unable to meet their friends. They cannot go out on dates. No more eating out, or late night parties. And the realization was not even instantaneous. It took some time of seeing all those posts and videos and blogs, before I went - oh, it's *not* supposed to be like that? Maybe as much as an year.
TLDR: I now have Tinder+, and a *lifetime* subscription of Bumble.<|eor|><|sor|>On the other end though, as lots of extraverted people started suffering some introverted (note not all, some) people had improved mental health by not having to force themselves to go out.
I hope when the pandemic is over those who struggled at home might have more compassion for those who are deeply fatigued by the rigmarole of going into offices.
While the social aspect of office life wasn't too exhausting for me, the extra two hours a day saved from commuting is amazing. I'm definitely happier working from home, even under strict lockdown.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 241 |
programmerhumor | fatalgift | hsspear | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>*Image Transcription: Meme*
---
\[*Two-panel meme showing two Wojak characters facing each other.*]
---
[*On the left is a blushing, blonde-haired woman who wears a blue daisy print dress with puffy sleeves. She smiles slightly. At her right is a shakily-drawn man with unkempt black hair, a scraggly beard, and red eyes. He wears a black hoodie and headphones and smokes a cigarette.*]
**Woman**: What's up? What do you do all day?
**Man**: Programming
---
[*The two people still face each other. The man is slightly more zoomed in.*]
**Woman**: Well done, very responsible during the pandemic.
**Man**: Pandemic?
---
^^I'm a human volunteer content transcriber and you could be too! [If you'd like more information on what we do and why we do it, click here!](https://www.reddit.com/r/TranscribersOfReddit/wiki/index)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 152 |
programmerhumor | ggtsu_00 | hstf51f | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>"How has the pandemic changed your life"
Me: it hasn't really, I just sit around typing on a computer all day, same as its always been.<|eor|><|sor|>"It's socially acceptable now to spend the whole day in my room behind my computer screen and having zero social interaction."<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 117 |
programmerhumor | ImVeganHowCanYouTell | hst5p04 | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Glad I quit smoking years ago, so that your meme isn't 100% correct.<|eor|><|sor|>Only those who know regex can not smoke<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 89 |
programmerhumor | Fmatosqg | hstrdzj | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>"How has the pandemic changed your life"
Me: it hasn't really, I just sit around typing on a computer all day, same as its always been.<|eor|><|sor|>Ain't that the truth!? I say this ALL THE TIME, and people think I am joking. If it wasn't because I have to step out to walk the dog, I could spend days on end holed up at home.<|eor|><|sor|>The difference between us: I don't have a dog<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 88 |
programmerhumor | monkeyhitman | hstdbn8 | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The pandemic taught me one thing. People being forced to live even a fraction of my normal life started having massive mental health issues. Therefore my lifestyle is likely the reason my depression won't go away.
Now if only I could do anything about it.<|eor|><|sor|>It truly was a *lightbulb* moment for me as well. As the days progressed, I saw more and more people starting to complain about how they can barely leave their homes. They are unable to meet their friends. They cannot go out on dates. No more eating out, or late night parties. And the realization was not even instantaneous. It took some time of seeing all those posts and videos and blogs, before I went - oh, it's *not* supposed to be like that? Maybe as much as an year.
TLDR: I now have Tinder+, and a *lifetime* subscription of Bumble.<|eor|><|sor|>On the other end though, as lots of extraverted people started suffering some introverted (note not all, some) people had improved mental health by not having to force themselves to go out.
I hope when the pandemic is over those who struggled at home might have more compassion for those who are deeply fatigued by the rigmarole of going into offices.
While the social aspect of office life wasn't too exhausting for me, the extra two hours a day saved from commuting is amazing. I'm definitely happier working from home, even under strict lockdown.<|eor|><|sor|>I missed being in the office because my work mates are awesome, but I did not miss the commute one iota.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 82 |
programmerhumor | metropolis_pt2 | hste3vo | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Can relate<|eor|><|sor|>So *that* is why the pizza guy is wearing a mask?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 79 |
programmerhumor | Bigb5wm | hssubl5 | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I did this in 2020 as well.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 78 |
programmerhumor | riricide | hst49b5 | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I was so happy to be writing my dissertation during the pandemic. I couldn't go out and party, but no one else could either so it was not bad at all
Of course when I graduated then suddenly it hit me that the pandemic is real and what everyone was talking about social isolation being difficult <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 70 |
programmerhumor | FinishingDutch | hstrycp | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>"How has the pandemic changed your life"
Me: it hasn't really, I just sit around typing on a computer all day, same as its always been.<|eor|><|sor|>Ain't that the truth!? I say this ALL THE TIME, and people think I am joking. If it wasn't because I have to step out to walk the dog, I could spend days on end holed up at home.<|eor|><|sor|>I honestly could do five more years of this if I had to. In december I basically spent a full 2,5 weeks indoors and loved it. I have the opposite of a winter depression, as I love cold, gray days. So spending that time indoors with no forced interactions or distractions was basically a vacation for me.
I do miss one or two things, but overall the pandemic isnt bothering me in the slightest.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 60 |
programmerhumor | junomaven | hst8vea | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It is funny how the pandemic changed some things that where awkward about me and now is normal. Like I never understand why we shaked hands. Now it is normal not to do it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 57 |
programmerhumor | CYKO_11 | hssv8w6 | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I actually forgot about covid<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 56 |
programmerhumor | T3hJ3hu | hst9y2k | <|sols|><|sot|>What?<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/oy3531gq4wb81.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The pandemic taught me one thing. People being forced to live even a fraction of my normal life started having massive mental health issues. Therefore my lifestyle is likely the reason my depression won't go away.
Now if only I could do anything about it.<|eor|><|sor|>Bad news, past self: you're going to be addicted to medicinal speed and spend most of your waking hours in front of a screen
But on the plus side: you're going to be addicted to medicinal speed and spend most of your waking hours in front of a screen<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 53 |
programmerhumor | DopePixel | obfidi | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37,334 |
programmerhumor | 10n3_w01f | h3nl7bp | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>//TODO : Write useful comments<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 811 |
programmerhumor | PeaPanties | h3nsk4i | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>[https://i.imgur.com/Ibeatuv.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Ibeatuv.jpg)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 470 |
programmerhumor | InDaBauhaus | h3nw1n2 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>//TODO : Write useful comments<|eor|><|sor|>OK.
// This is a comment.<|eor|><|sor|> a = 5 # this sets the variable a to the value of 5<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 420 |
programmerhumor | KKeff | h3nte3a | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>```
/**
* This method takes field named sum from this class and returns it in
* unchanged form.
* This method takes no arguments. Type of returned value is the same as type
* of the field. This method doe not take any argument.
* @return sum field of this class with same type as in class.
*/
public int getSum() {
return sum;
}
```
​
Better? Yes I worked for corporation that had a rule on pull request for every method to have java doc, how did you know?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 329 |
programmerhumor | pclouds | h3nv7du | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>//TODO : Write useful comments<|eor|><|sor|>OK.
// This is a comment.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 312 |
programmerhumor | DerGrummler | h3o00rb | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>```
/**
* This method takes field named sum from this class and returns it in
* unchanged form.
* This method takes no arguments. Type of returned value is the same as type
* of the field. This method doe not take any argument.
* @return sum field of this class with same type as in class.
*/
public int getSum() {
return sum;
}
```
​
Better? Yes I worked for corporation that had a rule on pull request for every method to have java doc, how did you know?<|eor|><|sor|>Wait is this real? No fucking way getter and setter methods have docs<|eor|><|sor|>We once had a corporate wide sonar rule that enforced 30% comment density *in every single file*. Some long config file? You better bring out the lorem Ipsum Generator.
People started writing unreadable one liners just to avoid comments. It was hilarious given a certain amount of dark humor. We eventually managed to convince the higher ups that no, we are not lazy, it truly doesn't make any sense.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 166 |
programmerhumor | themiraclemaker | h3nyo3q | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>```
/**
* This method takes field named sum from this class and returns it in
* unchanged form.
* This method takes no arguments. Type of returned value is the same as type
* of the field. This method doe not take any argument.
* @return sum field of this class with same type as in class.
*/
public int getSum() {
return sum;
}
```
​
Better? Yes I worked for corporation that had a rule on pull request for every method to have java doc, how did you know?<|eor|><|sor|>Wait is this real? No fucking way getter and setter methods have docs<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 124 |
programmerhumor | KingJellyfishII | h3o0sl0 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>```
/**
* This method takes field named sum from this class and returns it in
* unchanged form.
* This method takes no arguments. Type of returned value is the same as type
* of the field. This method doe not take any argument.
* @return sum field of this class with same type as in class.
*/
public int getSum() {
return sum;
}
```
​
Better? Yes I worked for corporation that had a rule on pull request for every method to have java doc, how did you know?<|eor|><|sor|>Wait is this real? No fucking way getter and setter methods have docs<|eor|><|sor|>We once had a corporate wide sonar rule that enforced 30% comment density *in every single file*. Some long config file? You better bring out the lorem Ipsum Generator.
People started writing unreadable one liners just to avoid comments. It was hilarious given a certain amount of dark humor. We eventually managed to convince the higher ups that no, we are not lazy, it truly doesn't make any sense.<|eor|><|sor|>```
//haha fuck management
//this comment is 100% useless!
```<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 113 |
programmerhumor | UltraCarnivore | h3nzw63 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>[https://i.imgur.com/Ibeatuv.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Ibeatuv.jpg)<|eor|><|sor|>Perfection<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 69 |
programmerhumor | r0ck0 | h3o52db | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>```
/**
* This method takes field named sum from this class and returns it in
* unchanged form.
* This method takes no arguments. Type of returned value is the same as type
* of the field. This method doe not take any argument.
* @return sum field of this class with same type as in class.
*/
public int getSum() {
return sum;
}
```
​
Better? Yes I worked for corporation that had a rule on pull request for every method to have java doc, how did you know?<|eor|><|sor|>Wait is this real? No fucking way getter and setter methods have docs<|eor|><|sor|>We once had a corporate wide sonar rule that enforced 30% comment density *in every single file*. Some long config file? You better bring out the lorem Ipsum Generator.
People started writing unreadable one liners just to avoid comments. It was hilarious given a certain amount of dark humor. We eventually managed to convince the higher ups that no, we are not lazy, it truly doesn't make any sense.<|eor|><|sor|>> We eventually managed to convince the higher ups
Reminds me of [this story:](https://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?story=Negative_2000_Lines_Of_Code.txt)
> In early 1982, the Lisa software team was trying to buckle down for the big push to ship the software within the next six months. Some of the managers decided that it would be a good idea to track the progress of each individual engineer in terms of the amount of code that they wrote from week to week. They devised a form that each engineer was required to submit every Friday, which included a field for the number of lines of code that were written that week.
>
>
>
> Bill Atkinson, the author of Quickdraw and the main user interface designer, who was by far the most important Lisa implementor, thought that lines of code was a silly measure of software productivity. He thought his goal was to write as small and fast a program as possible, and that the lines of code metric only encouraged writing sloppy, bloated, broken code.
>
> He recently was working on optimizing Quickdraw's region calculation machinery, and had completely rewritten the region engine using a simpler, more general algorithm which, after some tweaking, made region operations almost six times faster. As a by-product, the rewrite also saved around 2,000 lines of code.
>
> He was just putting the finishing touches on the optimization when it was time to fill out the management form for the first time. When he got to the lines of code part, he thought about it for a second, and then wrote in the number: -2000.
>
> I'm not sure how the managers reacted to that, but I do know that after a couple more weeks, they stopped asking Bill to fill out the form, and he gladly complied.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 69 |
programmerhumor | MarvinParanoAndroid | h3nmac0 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>/* asdfasdfasdf */<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 60 |
programmerhumor | dance1211 | h3nvroh | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>[removed]<|eor|><|sor|>That question is dumb. What do they expect to be the answer? Its my lifelong dream?<|eor|><|sor|>It's mainly to show you've done research on the company and not just applying for the
randomly sake of it. They're looking for answers like "I prefer to work in smaller teams" or "I understand you primarily program in in JavaScript which is by far my preferred language". Those kind of answers.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 59 |
programmerhumor | katyalovesherbike | h3nyqq5 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>> A common fallacy is to assume authors of incomprehensible code will somehow be able to express themselves lucidly and clearly in comments.
(c) Kevlin Henney. Stop using comments, start writing clear code.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 56 |
programmerhumor | DaveMoreau | h3ohxi1 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>//TODO : Write useful comments<|eor|><|sor|>OK.
// This is a comment.<|eor|><|sor|> a = 5 # this sets the variable a to the value of 5<|eor|><|sor|>Not even kidding some people do that where I work.<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>What about every other line being a commented out log line that was used to debug and they don't want to have to re-type if they ever need to debug again?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 55 |
programmerhumor | Shazvox | h3nqa5s | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>[removed]<|eor|><|sor|>"Oh, so you are looking for a management position then?"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 54 |
programmerhumor | StayAwayAndStayOut | h3ns0ga | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I read code more than I read comments<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 51 |
programmerhumor | equeim | h3nyea0 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Refuses to comment"<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7dzo1rbokj871.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I read code more than I read comments<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Comments are not there to make your code readable, it's simply not possible. If your code is not readable, comments won't magically change that. The purpose of comments is not to explain what your code does, but to explain why your code does what it does the way it does that and not the other way. If there is no need to explain this, there is no need for comments.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 47 |
programmerhumor | boolean_madness | 9awxap | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37,294 |
programmerhumor | PM_ME__ASIAN_BOOBS | e4yra5w | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Building a raft with...
**SPECS:** raft can fit two people, has a sail, is made of wood. Nobody thought about specifying that it should float.
**FUNDING:** the investors decided a raft wasn't a viable investment. You instead start implementing machine learning on a new Facebook but for dogs, still stuck on your island.
**QA:** your raft is ready, it floats, it sails. QA is still blocking you, as they report that if you spin clockwise three times while standing on the raft before it is hit by a meteorite it might sink
**MARKET RESEARCH:** There is more demand for a Facebook for dogs, and apparently another island is already working on it. They even use machine learning. The raft project is pushed back to next year.
**DEADLINE:** The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a *small* issue that *might* cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
**DEMAND:** Your raft is functional and open-source and saves hundreds of people who were stuck on their islands. You feel pride for exactly one day, before waking to a mailbox full of insults, death threats, complaints about the raft not being usable as a Facebook for dogs, and requests that you implement the ability to float on lava ***RIGHT NOW***.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 4,497 |
programmerhumor | alex199568 | e4ysrnd | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Personal projects, no specs, no funding, no QA, no market research, no deadlines, no demand. In the end you decide that island is not that bad.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 498 |
programmerhumor | Zoigl | e4ytrer | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Building a raft with...
**SPECS:** raft can fit two people, has a sail, is made of wood. Nobody thought about specifying that it should float.
**FUNDING:** the investors decided a raft wasn't a viable investment. You instead start implementing machine learning on a new Facebook but for dogs, still stuck on your island.
**QA:** your raft is ready, it floats, it sails. QA is still blocking you, as they report that if you spin clockwise three times while standing on the raft before it is hit by a meteorite it might sink
**MARKET RESEARCH:** There is more demand for a Facebook for dogs, and apparently another island is already working on it. They even use machine learning. The raft project is pushed back to next year.
**DEADLINE:** The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a *small* issue that *might* cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
**DEMAND:** Your raft is functional and open-source and saves hundreds of people who were stuck on their islands. You feel pride for exactly one day, before waking to a mailbox full of insults, death threats, complaints about the raft not being usable as a Facebook for dogs, and requests that you implement the ability to float on lava ***RIGHT NOW***.<|eor|><|sor|>> DEADLINE:
> The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a
> small
> issue that
> might
> cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
Definitely, my favourite.<|eor|><|sor|>Well the front isn't supposed to fall off.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 335 |
programmerhumor | 1337M0nst3r | e4yqz0f | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Me: *looks at old projects, no wonder I didn't finish any of them<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 295 |
programmerhumor | ftgbhs | e4yvim1 | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Building a raft with...
**SPECS:** raft can fit two people, has a sail, is made of wood. Nobody thought about specifying that it should float.
**FUNDING:** the investors decided a raft wasn't a viable investment. You instead start implementing machine learning on a new Facebook but for dogs, still stuck on your island.
**QA:** your raft is ready, it floats, it sails. QA is still blocking you, as they report that if you spin clockwise three times while standing on the raft before it is hit by a meteorite it might sink
**MARKET RESEARCH:** There is more demand for a Facebook for dogs, and apparently another island is already working on it. They even use machine learning. The raft project is pushed back to next year.
**DEADLINE:** The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a *small* issue that *might* cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
**DEMAND:** Your raft is functional and open-source and saves hundreds of people who were stuck on their islands. You feel pride for exactly one day, before waking to a mailbox full of insults, death threats, complaints about the raft not being usable as a Facebook for dogs, and requests that you implement the ability to float on lava ***RIGHT NOW***.<|eor|><|sor|>> DEADLINE:
> The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a
> small
> issue that
> might
> cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
Definitely, my favourite.<|eor|><|sor|>Well the front isn't supposed to fall off.<|eor|><|sor|>Well why did this happen?
Well a wave hit it.
A wave? Is that unusual?
A wave at sea? Chance in a million!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 271 |
programmerhumor | cucumbulous | e4yp4lm | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>I have all six of these at work
My raft looks like shit<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 242 |
programmerhumor | Lafreakshow | e4ywj3b | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Personal projects, no specs, no funding, no QA, no market research, no deadlines, no demand. In the end you decide that island is not that bad.<|eor|><|sor|>Me in a nutshell:
"I will build this epic game and nothing can stop me!" *starts coding immediately*
three days later: "Well this a mess, I better start over"
Three more days later: "Well this is still a mess, I better try something easier."
End result: TodoApp\_No\_27401.py<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 227 |
programmerhumor | showyerbewbs | e4yuh08 | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Building a raft with...
**SPECS:** raft can fit two people, has a sail, is made of wood. Nobody thought about specifying that it should float.
**FUNDING:** the investors decided a raft wasn't a viable investment. You instead start implementing machine learning on a new Facebook but for dogs, still stuck on your island.
**QA:** your raft is ready, it floats, it sails. QA is still blocking you, as they report that if you spin clockwise three times while standing on the raft before it is hit by a meteorite it might sink
**MARKET RESEARCH:** There is more demand for a Facebook for dogs, and apparently another island is already working on it. They even use machine learning. The raft project is pushed back to next year.
**DEADLINE:** The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a *small* issue that *might* cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
**DEMAND:** Your raft is functional and open-source and saves hundreds of people who were stuck on their islands. You feel pride for exactly one day, before waking to a mailbox full of insults, death threats, complaints about the raft not being usable as a Facebook for dogs, and requests that you implement the ability to float on lava ***RIGHT NOW***.<|eor|><|sor|>The float specification was not in Jira and has not been approved by the business at this time.
Addendum: Why is blockchain not implemented in this sprint? This makes the team look very non-viable to upper management.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 216 |
programmerhumor | Alphadestrious | e4yvzjd | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Building a raft with...
**SPECS:** raft can fit two people, has a sail, is made of wood. Nobody thought about specifying that it should float.
**FUNDING:** the investors decided a raft wasn't a viable investment. You instead start implementing machine learning on a new Facebook but for dogs, still stuck on your island.
**QA:** your raft is ready, it floats, it sails. QA is still blocking you, as they report that if you spin clockwise three times while standing on the raft before it is hit by a meteorite it might sink
**MARKET RESEARCH:** There is more demand for a Facebook for dogs, and apparently another island is already working on it. They even use machine learning. The raft project is pushed back to next year.
**DEADLINE:** The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a *small* issue that *might* cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
**DEMAND:** Your raft is functional and open-source and saves hundreds of people who were stuck on their islands. You feel pride for exactly one day, before waking to a mailbox full of insults, death threats, complaints about the raft not being usable as a Facebook for dogs, and requests that you implement the ability to float on lava ***RIGHT NOW***.<|eor|><|sor|>The float specification was not in Jira and has not been approved by the business at this time.
Addendum: Why is blockchain not implemented in this sprint? This makes the team look very non-viable to upper management.<|eor|><|sor|>We are using a phased approach to work on low hanging fruit before implementing blockchain by our tiger team. We are facing vicious headwinds and need some time to get our ducks in a row. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 136 |
programmerhumor | terrordrone_nl | e4ytwdu | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>I don't get the no deadline part :|<|eor|><|sor|>He's taking his sweet time and relaxing for a bit, not realising it's going to bite him in the ass very soon when management shows up demanding it be done yesterday. Demonstrated here by the sharks that are about to bite his ass. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 130 |
programmerhumor | showyerbewbs | e4yxif3 | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Building a raft with...
**SPECS:** raft can fit two people, has a sail, is made of wood. Nobody thought about specifying that it should float.
**FUNDING:** the investors decided a raft wasn't a viable investment. You instead start implementing machine learning on a new Facebook but for dogs, still stuck on your island.
**QA:** your raft is ready, it floats, it sails. QA is still blocking you, as they report that if you spin clockwise three times while standing on the raft before it is hit by a meteorite it might sink
**MARKET RESEARCH:** There is more demand for a Facebook for dogs, and apparently another island is already working on it. They even use machine learning. The raft project is pushed back to next year.
**DEADLINE:** The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a *small* issue that *might* cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
**DEMAND:** Your raft is functional and open-source and saves hundreds of people who were stuck on their islands. You feel pride for exactly one day, before waking to a mailbox full of insults, death threats, complaints about the raft not being usable as a Facebook for dogs, and requests that you implement the ability to float on lava ***RIGHT NOW***.<|eor|><|sor|>> DEADLINE:
> The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a
> small
> issue that
> might
> cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
Definitely, my favourite.<|eor|><|sor|>Well the front isn't supposed to fall off.<|eor|><|sor|>Well why did this happen?
Well a wave hit it.
A wave? Is that unusual?
A wave at sea? Chance in a million!<|eor|><|sor|>> A wave at sea?
#INCONCEIVABLE!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 88 |
programmerhumor | FistHitlersAnalCunt | e4yr1lp | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>I have all six of these at work
My raft looks like shit<|eor|><|sor|>On the plus side you have an entire cruise ship in your bathroom if you feel like a mojito and a conversation with a coffin dodger. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 86 |
programmerhumor | ablablababla | e4yy2zx | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Personal projects, no specs, no funding, no QA, no market research, no deadlines, no demand. In the end you decide that island is not that bad.<|eor|><|sor|>Me in a nutshell:
"I will build this epic game and nothing can stop me!" *starts coding immediately*
three days later: "Well this a mess, I better start over"
Three more days later: "Well this is still a mess, I better try something easier."
End result: TodoApp\_No\_27401.py<|eor|><|sor|>You mean TodoApp_No_27401_finalversion_6_legit_final_version.py? <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 82 |
programmerhumor | Ben-Z-S | e4yu6z9 | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>I don't get the no deadline part :|<|eor|><|sor|>He's taking his sweet time and relaxing for a bit, not realising it's going to bite him in the ass very soon when management shows up demanding it be done yesterday. Demonstrated here by the sharks that are about to bite his ass. <|eor|><|sor|>I also read it as spending time making his raft look pretty instead of any useful functionality. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 77 |
programmerhumor | OnlineGrab | e4yrp5v | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Building a raft with...
**SPECS:** raft can fit two people, has a sail, is made of wood. Nobody thought about specifying that it should float.
**FUNDING:** the investors decided a raft wasn't a viable investment. You instead start implementing machine learning on a new Facebook but for dogs, still stuck on your island.
**QA:** your raft is ready, it floats, it sails. QA is still blocking you, as they report that if you spin clockwise three times while standing on the raft before it is hit by a meteorite it might sink
**MARKET RESEARCH:** There is more demand for a Facebook for dogs, and apparently another island is already working on it. They even use machine learning. The raft project is pushed back to next year.
**DEADLINE:** The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a *small* issue that *might* cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
**DEMAND:** Your raft is functional and open-source and saves hundreds of people who were stuck on their islands. You feel pride for exactly one day, before waking to a mailbox full of insults, death threats, complaints about the raft not being usable as a Facebook for dogs, and requests that you implement the ability to float on lava ***RIGHT NOW***.<|eor|><|sor|>Made me laugh. Have an upvote.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 74 |
programmerhumor | marmaladeontoast | e4yu5tn | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Building a raft with...
**SPECS:** raft can fit two people, has a sail, is made of wood. Nobody thought about specifying that it should float.
**FUNDING:** the investors decided a raft wasn't a viable investment. You instead start implementing machine learning on a new Facebook but for dogs, still stuck on your island.
**QA:** your raft is ready, it floats, it sails. QA is still blocking you, as they report that if you spin clockwise three times while standing on the raft before it is hit by a meteorite it might sink
**MARKET RESEARCH:** There is more demand for a Facebook for dogs, and apparently another island is already working on it. They even use machine learning. The raft project is pushed back to next year.
**DEADLINE:** The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a *small* issue that *might* cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
**DEMAND:** Your raft is functional and open-source and saves hundreds of people who were stuck on their islands. You feel pride for exactly one day, before waking to a mailbox full of insults, death threats, complaints about the raft not being usable as a Facebook for dogs, and requests that you implement the ability to float on lava ***RIGHT NOW***.<|eor|><|sor|>wait, someone else is working on AI-powered facebook for dogs?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 61 |
programmerhumor | tripszoms | e4yxzs2 | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Building a raft with...
**SPECS:** raft can fit two people, has a sail, is made of wood. Nobody thought about specifying that it should float.
**FUNDING:** the investors decided a raft wasn't a viable investment. You instead start implementing machine learning on a new Facebook but for dogs, still stuck on your island.
**QA:** your raft is ready, it floats, it sails. QA is still blocking you, as they report that if you spin clockwise three times while standing on the raft before it is hit by a meteorite it might sink
**MARKET RESEARCH:** There is more demand for a Facebook for dogs, and apparently another island is already working on it. They even use machine learning. The raft project is pushed back to next year.
**DEADLINE:** The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a *small* issue that *might* cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
**DEMAND:** Your raft is functional and open-source and saves hundreds of people who were stuck on their islands. You feel pride for exactly one day, before waking to a mailbox full of insults, death threats, complaints about the raft not being usable as a Facebook for dogs, and requests that you implement the ability to float on lava ***RIGHT NOW***.<|eor|><|sor|>The float specification was not in Jira and has not been approved by the business at this time.
Addendum: Why is blockchain not implemented in this sprint? This makes the team look very non-viable to upper management.<|eor|><|sor|>We are using a phased approach to work on low hanging fruit before implementing blockchain by our tiger team. We are facing vicious headwinds and need some time to get our ducks in a row. <|eor|><|sor|>Going to use this exact line. Thank you for writing my daily meeting update.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 60 |
programmerhumor | xyl0ph0ne | e4yxt20 | <|sols|><|sot|>Building a raft<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.monkeyuser.com/assets/images/2018/103-building-a-raft.png<|eol|><|sor|>Building a raft with...
**SPECS:** raft can fit two people, has a sail, is made of wood. Nobody thought about specifying that it should float.
**FUNDING:** the investors decided a raft wasn't a viable investment. You instead start implementing machine learning on a new Facebook but for dogs, still stuck on your island.
**QA:** your raft is ready, it floats, it sails. QA is still blocking you, as they report that if you spin clockwise three times while standing on the raft before it is hit by a meteorite it might sink
**MARKET RESEARCH:** There is more demand for a Facebook for dogs, and apparently another island is already working on it. They even use machine learning. The raft project is pushed back to next year.
**DEADLINE:** The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a *small* issue that *might* cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
**DEMAND:** Your raft is functional and open-source and saves hundreds of people who were stuck on their islands. You feel pride for exactly one day, before waking to a mailbox full of insults, death threats, complaints about the raft not being usable as a Facebook for dogs, and requests that you implement the ability to float on lava ***RIGHT NOW***.<|eor|><|sor|>> DEADLINE:
> The raft is released at the last moment, and actually looks like a raft. It has only a
> small
> issue that
> might
> cause it to sink, but only if it's on water. The user probably won't notice, it's fine.
Definitely, my favourite.<|eor|><|sor|>Well the front isn't supposed to fall off.<|eor|><|sor|>Well why did this happen?
Well a wave hit it.
A wave? Is that unusual?
A wave at sea? Chance in a million!<|eor|><|sor|>> A wave at sea?
#INCONCEIVABLE!<|eor|><|sor|>#INCONSEAVABLE!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 60 |
programmerhumor | AUPMAReddit | dk1i7h | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37,264 |
programmerhumor | oaga_strizzi | f49qmxf | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>How is shit like this not illegal?
Or if it is illegal, how stupid are companies do generate this shit on the client where it's so easy to call them out on it.
I'm sure booking.com does the same, but at least they're doing it server-side<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,961 |
programmerhumor | Holy_Grapes | f49qzgc | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>That happens because they left the function on the client side. A backend function and nobody would have busted them.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,862 |
programmerhumor | lordheart | f49rf3o | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>That happens because they left the function on the client side. A backend function and nobody would have busted them.<|eor|><|sor|>Can still bust them if they arent consistent. Two devices check same flights over different ips.
If the numbers tend not to match, pretty good sign something is up.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,264 |
programmerhumor | carnau | f49zrai | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>How is shit like this not illegal?
Or if it is illegal, how stupid are companies do generate this shit on the client where it's so easy to call them out on it.
I'm sure booking.com does the same, but at least they're doing it server-side<|eor|><|sor|>I don't remember exactly which company was raising flight prices a little bit every time you entered their website. It sounds to me that it was Vueling, but I can be wrong.
They were storing that information on a cookie, so every time you checked the price it was increased a little bit, making you think that if you didn't buy the flight right there, you could end paying more.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,129 |
programmerhumor | 0x564A00 | f4a19dx | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>How is shit like this not illegal?
Or if it is illegal, how stupid are companies do generate this shit on the client where it's so easy to call them out on it.
I'm sure booking.com does the same, but at least they're doing it server-side<|eor|><|sor|>I don't remember exactly which company was raising flight prices a little bit every time you entered their website. It sounds to me that it was Vueling, but I can be wrong.
They were storing that information on a cookie, so every time you checked the price it was increased a little bit, making you think that if you didn't buy the flight right there, you could end paying more.<|eor|><|sor|>I wonder if one could have modified that cookie to contain a negative number.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 756 |
programmerhumor | Panossa | f49rsvx | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>That happens because they left the function on the client side. A backend function and nobody would have busted them.<|eor|><|sor|>Can still bust them if they arent consistent. Two devices check same flights over different ips.
If the numbers tend not to match, pretty good sign something is up.<|eor|><|sor|>Not really, ask YouTube how easy it is to show consistent numbers on anything if you have a big user base.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 703 |
programmerhumor | HighRelevancy | f4a6qwo | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>How is shit like this not illegal?
Or if it is illegal, how stupid are companies do generate this shit on the client where it's so easy to call them out on it.
I'm sure booking.com does the same, but at least they're doing it server-side<|eor|><|sor|>I don't remember exactly which company was raising flight prices a little bit every time you entered their website. It sounds to me that it was Vueling, but I can be wrong.
They were storing that information on a cookie, so every time you checked the price it was increased a little bit, making you think that if you didn't buy the flight right there, you could end paying more.<|eor|><|sor|>I wonder if one could have modified that cookie to contain a negative number.<|eor|><|sor|>If you visited a billion times, then maybe...<|eor|><|sor|>No like you can literally just modify the cookie on your end
(disclaimer: websites can sign cookies so modification can be detected - though this is not frequently done, and when it is it's done poorly, but whatever)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 628 |
programmerhumor | 2003___honda | f4a4t8v | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>How is shit like this not illegal?
Or if it is illegal, how stupid are companies do generate this shit on the client where it's so easy to call them out on it.
I'm sure booking.com does the same, but at least they're doing it server-side<|eor|><|sor|>I don't remember exactly which company was raising flight prices a little bit every time you entered their website. It sounds to me that it was Vueling, but I can be wrong.
They were storing that information on a cookie, so every time you checked the price it was increased a little bit, making you think that if you didn't buy the flight right there, you could end paying more.<|eor|><|sor|>I wonder if one could have modified that cookie to contain a negative number.<|eor|><|sor|>If you visited a billion times, then maybe...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 428 |
programmerhumor | TheTrueBlueTJ | f4a9jj1 | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>How is shit like this not illegal?
Or if it is illegal, how stupid are companies do generate this shit on the client where it's so easy to call them out on it.
I'm sure booking.com does the same, but at least they're doing it server-side<|eor|><|sor|>I don't remember exactly which company was raising flight prices a little bit every time you entered their website. It sounds to me that it was Vueling, but I can be wrong.
They were storing that information on a cookie, so every time you checked the price it was increased a little bit, making you think that if you didn't buy the flight right there, you could end paying more.<|eor|><|sor|>I wonder if one could have modified that cookie to contain a negative number.<|eor|><|sor|>If you visited a billion times, then maybe...<|eor|><|sor|>No like you can literally just modify the cookie on your end
(disclaimer: websites can sign cookies so modification can be detected - though this is not frequently done, and when it is it's done poorly, but whatever)<|eor|><|sor|>Then you might as well store the variable server-side.<|eor|><|sor|>...as they should.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 392 |
programmerhumor | roby_65 | f49z0k5 | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>There is a gaming website that shows how many game keys it has in stock.
The number is generated server side... But changes at each refresh. And it can change from 5 to 23 in a refresh lol.
Please at least save it for the session. Damn.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 375 |
programmerhumor | Nchi | f49xxo2 | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>That happens because they left the function on the client side. A backend function and nobody would have busted them.<|eor|><|sor|>Can still bust them if they arent consistent. Two devices check same flights over different ips.
If the numbers tend not to match, pretty good sign something is up.<|eor|><|sor|>Not really, ask YouTube how easy it is to show consistent numbers on anything if you have a big user base.<|eor|><|sor|>Youtube has thousands and thousands of concurrent page views, a single flight wouldn't really even hit this fake 40 number concurrently- not like there is a 10 minute minimum on flight tickets or anything.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 334 |
programmerhumor | totoropoko | f49td6w | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>How is shit like this not illegal?
Or if it is illegal, how stupid are companies do generate this shit on the client where it's so easy to call them out on it.
I'm sure booking.com does the same, but at least they're doing it server-side<|eor|><|sor|>Laws don't apply to rich people<|eor|><|sor|>Or JavaScript<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 310 |
programmerhumor | aphaelion | f4an6t0 | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>That happens because they left the function on the client side. A backend function and nobody would have busted them.<|eor|><|sor|>Can still bust them if they arent consistent. Two devices check same flights over different ips.
If the numbers tend not to match, pretty good sign something is up.<|eor|><|sor|>Not really, ask YouTube how easy it is to show consistent numbers on anything if you have a big user base.<|eor|><|sor|>Youtube has thousands and thousands of concurrent page views, a single flight wouldn't really even hit this fake 40 number concurrently- not like there is a 10 minute minimum on flight tickets or anything.<|eor|><|sor|>*2.6M people are looking at this flight, book now before time runs out!*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 294 |
programmerhumor | pedmc123 | f49q5kx | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>What does that graph at the end show<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 287 |
programmerhumor | fb39ca4 | f4a84r1 | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>How is shit like this not illegal?
Or if it is illegal, how stupid are companies do generate this shit on the client where it's so easy to call them out on it.
I'm sure booking.com does the same, but at least they're doing it server-side<|eor|><|sor|>I don't remember exactly which company was raising flight prices a little bit every time you entered their website. It sounds to me that it was Vueling, but I can be wrong.
They were storing that information on a cookie, so every time you checked the price it was increased a little bit, making you think that if you didn't buy the flight right there, you could end paying more.<|eor|><|sor|>I wonder if one could have modified that cookie to contain a negative number.<|eor|><|sor|>If you visited a billion times, then maybe...<|eor|><|sor|>No like you can literally just modify the cookie on your end
(disclaimer: websites can sign cookies so modification can be detected - though this is not frequently done, and when it is it's done poorly, but whatever)<|eor|><|sor|>Then you might as well store the variable server-side.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 238 |
programmerhumor | underexaggeration | f49qbda | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>What does that graph at the end show<|eor|><|sor|>The quantile function of the random variable "number of people viewing this flight". That is, given a number x between 0 and 1, the graph shows you the number of people that you are 100x% likely to not exceed when you choose a number of people randomly using the method implemented in the code.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 225 |
programmerhumor | billionai1 | f4ahn2q | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>I don't remember exactly which company was raising flight prices a little bit every time you entered their website. It sounds to me that it was Vueling, but I can be wrong.
They were storing that information on a cookie, so every time you checked the price it was increased a little bit, making you think that if you didn't buy the flight right there, you could end paying more.<|eor|><|sor|>I wonder if one could have modified that cookie to contain a negative number.<|eor|><|sor|>If you visited a billion times, then maybe...<|eor|><|sor|>No like you can literally just modify the cookie on your end
(disclaimer: websites can sign cookies so modification can be detected - though this is not frequently done, and when it is it's done poorly, but whatever)<|eor|><|sor|>Then you might as well store the variable server-side.<|eor|><|sor|>...as they should.<|eor|><|sor|>They probably do, the cookie was probably just to identify the same user.<|eor|><|sor|>You give those guys far too much credit<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 220 |
programmerhumor | reconman | f4a0oim | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>What does that graph at the end show<|eor|><|sor|>The quantile function of the random variable "number of people viewing this flight". That is, given a number x between 0 and 1, the graph shows you the number of people that you are 100x% likely to not exceed when you choose a number of people randomly using the method implemented in the code.<|eor|><|sor|>Which is actually inaccurate since there's a floor function involved so you would have something like this: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+floor%2828%2B17*x%29%2C+x%3D0+to+1<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 213 |
programmerhumor | Famous_Profile | f49s7ib | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>How is shit like this not illegal?
Or if it is illegal, how stupid are companies do generate this shit on the client where it's so easy to call them out on it.
I'm sure booking.com does the same, but at least they're doing it server-side<|eor|><|sor|>Laws don't apply to rich people<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 206 |
programmerhumor | frankchester | f4a1apb | <|sols|><|sot|>random inspection<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/w0x3wuhfwgt31.png<|eol|><|sor|>I worked for an OTA once and had to build exactly this. It was something like grab a value between 2 and 6.
I did question at one point the legality of it and was told that it had "probably been worked out somewhere".<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 181 |
programmerhumor | aman3009 | px144l | <|sols|><|sot|>GHaaS<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/eavntc7357q71.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37,208 |
programmerhumor | kirA9001 | hekk7uj | <|sols|><|sot|>GHaaS<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/eavntc7357q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Gitar Hero<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,567 |
programmerhumor | Jullira | hekrdrv | <|sols|><|sot|>GHaaS<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/eavntc7357q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>this post helps with my imposter syndrome.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 955 |
programmerhumor | Atrag2021 | heko2p1 | <|sols|><|sot|>GHaaS<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/eavntc7357q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's not fucked up - it's an accurate representation of the commits without manipulating it with rebasing.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 954 |
programmerhumor | person_not_found | hekj90y | <|sols|><|sot|>GHaaS<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/eavntc7357q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Damn he must be using some weird string gauge to make bends like that<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 712 |
programmerhumor | q0099 | hekp4z9 | <|sols|><|sot|>GHaaS<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/eavntc7357q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Gitar Hero<|eor|><|sor|>Through the Commits and Merges<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 709 |
programmerhumor | StormCrowMith | hekn0rm | <|sols|><|sot|>GHaaS<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/eavntc7357q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Gitar Hero<|eor|><|sor|>I think thats Master of Branches from the band Mergeallica...Ill see myself out<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 612 |
programmerhumor | DutchLeopardNL | heknpg9 | <|sols|><|sot|>GHaaS<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/eavntc7357q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Sir why is your git playing thunderstruck.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 495 |
programmerhumor | ChristieFox | hekplw6 | <|sols|><|sot|>GHaaS<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/eavntc7357q71.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's not fucked up - it's an accurate representation of the commits without manipulating it with rebasing.<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah, I think as soon as you work with other people or with feedback by other people, it just gets somewhat messy.
The last relatively smooth history I got was in a university project in which we basically all had our separated mini projects. That was bliss because the only merge conflicts were you yourself fucking up, or someone fucking up with your files while trying to write an API to your part (or blatantly copying approaches).<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 344 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.